Ward T T, Rimland D, Kauffman C, Huycke M, Evans T G, Heifets L
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;27(5):1278-85. doi: 10.1086/514999.
Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection continues to be a common opportunistic infection in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The optimal therapy for disseminated MAC infection is unclear. We compared azithromycin plus ethambutol with clarithromycin plus ethambutol in the treatment of disseminated MAC infection in HIV type 1-infected patients, examining the frequency of bacteremia clearance, time to clearance, and study drug tolerance after 16 weeks of therapy. Fifty-nine patients for whom blood cultures were positive for MAC were enrolled in the study from 10 university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for determination of quantitative bacteremia and clinical outcomes. Clearance of bacteremia was seen at the final visit in 37.5% of azithromycin-treated patients and in 85.7% of clarithromycin-treated patients (P = .007). The estimated median time to clearance of bacteremia was also significantly different between the two treatment arms: 4.38 weeks for clarithromycin recipients vs. > 16 weeks for azithromycin recipients (P = .0018). Only one isolate developed macrolide resistance during therapy. Abatement of symptoms, other laboratory-evident abnormalities, and adverse effects were similar in the two groups. At the doses used in this study, clarithromycin/ethambutol produced a more rapid resolution of bacteremia than did azithromycin/ethambutol, and clarithromycin/ethambutol was more effective at sterilization of blood cultures after 16 weeks of therapy.
播散性鸟分枝杆菌复合体(MAC)感染仍然是人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者常见的机会性感染。播散性MAC感染的最佳治疗方案尚不清楚。我们比较了阿奇霉素加乙胺丁醇与克拉霉素加乙胺丁醇治疗1型HIV感染患者播散性MAC感染的疗效,观察了治疗16周后菌血症清除频率、清除时间和研究药物耐受性。从10家大学附属退伍军人事务医疗中心招募了59例MAC血培养阳性的患者。37例患者可评估定量菌血症和临床结局。在最后一次随访时,阿奇霉素治疗组37.5%的患者菌血症清除,克拉霉素治疗组85.7%的患者菌血症清除(P = 0.007)。两个治疗组之间菌血症清除的估计中位时间也有显著差异:克拉霉素治疗组为4.38周,阿奇霉素治疗组大于16周(P = 0.0018)。治疗期间只有一株分离菌产生了大环内酯耐药性。两组症状缓解、其他实验室明显异常及不良反应相似。在本研究使用的剂量下,克拉霉素/乙胺丁醇比阿奇霉素/乙胺丁醇能更快地清除菌血症,且在治疗16周后克拉霉素/乙胺丁醇在血培养杀菌方面更有效。