Multani P S, O'Day S, Nadler L M, Grossbard M L
Hematology/Oncology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Nov;4(11):2599-604.
Immunotoxins, composed of a monoclonal antibody conjugated to a protein toxin, mediate cell death through novel cytotoxic mechanisms. Anti-B4-blocked ricin (anti-B4-bR) recognizes CD19-positive cells, which includes most B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). Previous Phase I clinical studies of anti-B4-bR, using both bolus and continuous dosing regimens, demonstrated no safety or efficacy advantage to the continuous infusion regimen. This Phase II trial in 16 patients with relapsed CD19-positive NHL was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anti-B4-bR when administered at the previously established maximum tolerated dose using a daily bolus for a 5 consecutive days schedule. Serum pharmacokinetics were measured in selected patients. Tissue samples of involved lymph nodes and bone marrow were also obtained from a portion of patients for determination of anti-B4-bR penetration into tissues. Toxicity was similar to what has been described previously for anti-B4-bR and consisted mainly of reversible elevations of hepatic transaminases and mild to moderate thrombocytopenia. No sustained clinical responses were documented. Pharmacokinetic measurements demonstrated that serum levels compatible with 3 logs of cell kill in vitro could be sustained for several hours in most patients. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue samples provided some insight into the low efficacy. The immunotoxin could be detected in three of the four bone marrow aspirate samples but in only two of the seven lymph node specimens. Thus, anti-B4-bR, using a single daily bolus for a 5 consecutive day schedule, is not an active agent in relapsed NHL. Poor penetration into certain sites of disease may be one explanation for its lack of efficacy.
免疫毒素由与蛋白毒素偶联的单克隆抗体组成,通过新的细胞毒性机制介导细胞死亡。抗B4阻断蓖麻毒素(anti-B4-bR)识别CD19阳性细胞,其中包括大多数B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)。先前关于anti-B4-bR的I期临床研究,采用推注和持续给药方案,结果表明持续输注方案在安全性或疗效方面并无优势。这项II期试验纳入了16例复发的CD19阳性NHL患者,旨在评估以先前确定的最大耐受剂量、采用每日推注、连续5天给药方案时anti-B4-bR的疗效。对部分选定患者测量了血清药代动力学。还从部分患者获取了受累淋巴结和骨髓的组织样本,以测定anti-B4-bR在组织中的渗透情况。毒性与先前描述的anti-B4-bR相似,主要包括肝转氨酶可逆性升高和轻度至中度血小板减少。未记录到持续的临床反应。药代动力学测量表明,大多数患者血清水平在体外与3个对数级的细胞杀伤相当,且可维持数小时。组织样本的免疫组化分析为疗效不佳提供了一些线索。在4份骨髓穿刺样本中的3份中可检测到免疫毒素,但在7份淋巴结标本中仅在2份中检测到。因此,对于复发的NHL,采用每日单次推注、连续5天给药方案的anti-B4-bR并非有效药物。对某些疾病部位的渗透不良可能是其缺乏疗效的一个原因。