Holmen J, Hetlevik I, Krüger O
Samfunnsmedisinsk forskningssenter, Statens institutt for folkehelse, Verdal.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Oct 20;118(25):3972-4.
This paper points to the dilemmas posed by the lack of longitudinal studies of morbidity and mortality, or of side-effects, of several drugs widely used in treatment of asymptomatic risk factors. New drugs and new indications make large groups eligible for treatment, i.e. for mildly elevated blood pressure or cholesterol levels, impaired glucose tolerance and risk of osteoporosis. The treatment of people with asymptomatic elevated risk factors differs in point of principle from the treatment of diseases, symptoms or complaints: The patient has no subjective feeling about his or her condition; the health risk is usually lower; there are no good evaluation measures for the treatment; and the risk that side-effects outweigh the benefits is greater. This makes high quality treatment and good information to patients even more important than in ordinary practice. More knowledge about effects with regard to morbidity and mortality and about long-term side-effects is necessary. Doctors should prefer drugs for which the effects are documented, and give patients with the highest health risk top priority.
本文指出了在对治疗无症状风险因素广泛使用的几种药物的发病率、死亡率或副作用缺乏纵向研究的情况下所带来的困境。新药和新适应症使大量人群符合治疗条件,即血压或胆固醇水平轻度升高、糖耐量受损以及存在骨质疏松风险的人群。对无症状风险因素升高人群的治疗在原则上不同于对疾病、症状或不适的治疗:患者对自身状况没有主观感受;健康风险通常较低;对于治疗没有良好的评估措施;并且副作用超过益处的风险更大。这使得高质量的治疗以及向患者提供良好的信息比在常规医疗实践中更为重要。有必要更多地了解发病率、死亡率方面的影响以及长期副作用。医生应优先选用有疗效记录的药物,并将健康风险最高的患者列为首要治疗对象。