Woodrow P
Middlesex University, Centre for Old Age Studies (COAST), Whittington Education Centre, London.
Br J Nurs. 1998;7(17):1018-20. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1998.7.17.5596.
This article, the second of a five-part series exploring interventions for confusional states, discusses reality orientation (RO). For many decades, this form of intervention has been widely used and accepted as a way of reducing symptoms of confusion. However, an argument against RO is that it makes the person a passive recipient and reinforces feelings of disempowerment. This article describes the development of RO, exploring its strengths and weaknesses. Literature on the subject is largely anecdotal and dated as RO has been largely superseded by the interventions discussed in later articles, e.g. reminiscence and validation therapy.
本文是探讨意识模糊状态干预措施的系列文章五篇中的第二篇,讨论了现实定向疗法(RO)。几十年来,这种干预形式已被广泛使用并被视为减轻意识模糊症状的一种方法。然而,反对现实定向疗法的一种观点是,它使患者成为被动接受者,并强化了无助感。本文描述了现实定向疗法的发展,探讨了其优缺点。关于该主题的文献大多是轶事性的且年代久远,因为现实定向疗法在很大程度上已被后续文章中讨论的干预措施(如回忆疗法和确认疗法)所取代。