Landen M G, Beller M, Funk E, Rolka H R, Middaugh J
Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Program Office, New Mexico Department of Health, Las Cruces, NM 88001, USA.
Pediatrics. 1998 Dec;102(6):E71. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.6.e71.
To determine the most effective outbreak control strategy for school-based measles outbreaks as the proportion of children with two doses of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) increases.
A school-based measles outbreak during 1996 involving 63 cases in Juneau, Alaska (population 29 288), where systematic revaccination with MCV was not implemented.
A retrospective evaluation using chain-of-transmission data of three possible outbreak control strategies: no school revaccination, targeted school revaccination (affected schools only), and community-wide school revaccination (all schools). Two-dose MCV coverage among students was estimated from school vaccination records and a survey issued to parents.
Potentially preventable cases of measles and doses of MCV administered per case prevented.
Two-dose MCV coverage among Juneau students was estimated to be 44% and 53% immediately before and after the outbreak, respectively. Of all the measles cases, an estimated 24 to 28 and 27 to 31 were potentially preventable by the targeted and community-wide school revaccination strategies, respectively. Either strategy might have optimally decreased the outbreak duration by 1 month, sparing one of seven affected schools and 10 of 12 unvaccinated children who had measles. Approximately 133 to 155 and 139 to 160 doses of MCV per case prevented would have been required for targeted and community-wide school revaccination, respectively.
Either targeted or community-wide school revaccination would have been effective control strategies for this outbreak. Targeted school revaccination is probably the intervention of choice for school-based measles outbreaks in larger communities with higher two-dose MCV coverage. As two-dose MCV coverage continues to increase in the United States, public health control measures to respond to outbreaks need to be reevaluated.
随着含麻疹疫苗(MCV)两剂接种儿童比例的增加,确定针对学校麻疹暴发最有效的控制策略。
1996年阿拉斯加朱诺市发生一起学校麻疹暴发,涉及63例病例(该市人口29288),当地未实施MCV系统再接种。
利用传播链数据对三种可能的暴发控制策略进行回顾性评估:不进行学校再接种、针对性学校再接种(仅对受影响学校)和社区范围学校再接种(所有学校)。根据学校疫苗接种记录和向家长发放的调查问卷估算学生中MCV两剂接种覆盖率。
麻疹潜在可预防病例数以及每预防一例病例所接种的MCV剂数。
朱诺市学生在暴发前和暴发后的MCV两剂接种覆盖率估计分别为44%和53%。在所有麻疹病例中,针对性学校再接种策略和社区范围学校再接种策略分别估计可预防24至28例和27至31例。两种策略都可能将暴发持续时间最佳缩短1个月,使七所受影响学校中的一所及12名患麻疹的未接种儿童中的10名免受感染。针对性学校再接种和社区范围学校再接种每预防一例病例分别大约需要接种133至155剂和139至160剂MCV。
针对性学校再接种或社区范围学校再接种均为此次暴发的有效控制策略。对于两剂MCV接种覆盖率较高的较大社区中的学校麻疹暴发,针对性学校再接种可能是首选干预措施。随着美国MCV两剂接种覆盖率持续上升,应对暴发的公共卫生控制措施需要重新评估。