Duka T, Lupp A
University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Behav Pharmacol. 1997 Oct;8(5):373-82.
The effect of incentive was investigated upon performance in the antisaccade (AS), memory saccade (MS) and reflexive saccade (RS) task, alone and following performance in tasks of a psychometric battery. Accuracy performance (correct saccades) in the AS and MS task is dependent on two prefrontal functions, the preservation of transient information across short time intervals and the inhibition of prepotent but inappropriate responses, and is impaired in patient populations with known prefrontal dysfunction. It was predicted that, in normal humans, incentive will improve accuracy performance in the AS and MS task, leaving performance in the RS task unaffected (study 1). Saccades were recorded in 24 healthy young male volunteers. Measurements of saccades were performed (in the presence and absence of monetary incentive) alone or following performance on a psychometric test battery that included tasks of working memory, vigilance, attention and psychomotor activity. Incentive increased the number of correct saccades in the AS task and the performance index in the working memory task. No other direct changes were seen in the presence of incentive. The role of dopamine in performance in the AS compared to the RS task was investigated subsequently in study 2. Twenty healthy young male volunteers received levodopa and benserazide (100 and 25 mg, respectively) orally, and 1 and 5 h later measurements of AS and RS were performed. Levodopa significantly decreased the number of correct saccades in the AS task. No other effects were seen. These data, taken together, suggest, first, that the accuracy performance in the AS task is more sensitive than in the MS or RS task, to positive incentive due to monetary reward; and second, that the dopaminergic system may mediate such an effect, because levodopa, a dopaminergic drug, influenced the same performance measurement. The relationship, however, between these two manipulations (incentive and administration of dopaminergic drugs) is not clear, because incentive improved and levodopa impaired performance.
研究了奖励对反扫视(AS)、记忆扫视(MS)和反射性扫视(RS)任务表现的影响,这些任务单独进行,以及在完成一套心理测量任务之后进行。AS和MS任务中的准确性表现(正确扫视)取决于两种前额叶功能,即在短时间间隔内保存瞬态信息以及抑制优势但不适当的反应,并且在已知前额叶功能障碍的患者群体中受损。据预测,在正常人类中,奖励将提高AS和MS任务中的准确性表现,而RS任务的表现不受影响(研究1)。记录了24名健康年轻男性志愿者的扫视情况。扫视测量在单独(有或没有金钱奖励)或在完成一套包括工作记忆、警觉性、注意力和心理运动活动任务的心理测量测试之后进行。奖励增加了AS任务中正确扫视的数量以及工作记忆任务中的表现指数。在有奖励的情况下未观察到其他直接变化。随后在研究2中调查了多巴胺在AS任务与RS任务表现中的作用。20名健康年轻男性志愿者口服左旋多巴和苄丝肼(分别为100毫克和25毫克),并在1小时和5小时后进行AS和RS测量。左旋多巴显著减少了AS任务中正确扫视的数量。未观察到其他影响。综合这些数据表明,首先,AS任务中的准确性表现比MS或RS任务对金钱奖励带来的积极奖励更敏感;其次,多巴胺能系统可能介导这种效应,因为多巴胺能药物左旋多巴影响了相同的表现测量。然而,这两种操作(奖励和多巴胺能药物给药)之间的关系尚不清楚,因为奖励提高了表现,而左旋多巴损害了表现。