• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰全科医疗中新上市药物疑似药物不良反应的年龄和性别分布:48项队列研究分析

Age and sex distribution of suspected adverse drug reactions to newly marketed drugs in general practice in England: analysis of 48 cohort studies.

作者信息

Martin R M, Biswas P N, Freemantle S N, Pearce G L, Mann R D

机构信息

Drug Safety Research Unit, University of Southampton.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;46(5):505-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00817.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00817.x
PMID:9833605
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1873702/
Abstract

AIMS

Little is known about the frequency with which suspected adverse drug reactions are seen by general practitioners after the prescription of newly marketed drugs. We investigated age and sex specific incidence rates of suspected adverse drug reactions recorded by general practitioners in England after the prescription of selected newly marketed drugs.

METHODS

Information was collected from 48 national cohort studies of newly marketed drugs studied by prescription-event monitoring. Questionnaires were sent to prescribers asking for details of events and suspected adverse drug reactions recorded in the patients' notes occurring after the drugs were prescribed.

RESULTS

During the 48 cohort studies, a total of 513608 patients were investigated, of which 221781 (43.2%) were males and 285862 (55.7%) were females. The overall incidence of suspected adverse drug reactions in males was 12.9 per 10000 patient-months of exposure (95% confidence limits 12.3 to 13.5), and in females was 20.6 per 10000 patient-months of exposure (95% confidence limits 19.9 to 21.3). The overall age-standardised relative risk of an adverse drug reaction in females compared with males was 1.6 (1.5-1.7). This sex difference was significant in all age groups above 19 years of age, and was relatively consistent across all age groups (chi2 test for heterogeneity = 9.2, P=0.3). The highest rate of recording in males was in the 50-59 year age group, and in females was in the 30-39 year age group.

CONCLUSIONS

In general practice in England, suspected adverse drug reactions to newly marketed drugs are recorded more often in adults aged between 30 and 59 years of age and are 60% more common in women than in men. The sex difference occurs in all age groups over 19 years of age.

摘要

目的

对于全科医生在开具新上市药物处方后所见到的疑似药物不良反应的发生频率,人们了解甚少。我们调查了英格兰全科医生在开具选定新上市药物处方后记录的特定年龄和性别的疑似药物不良反应发生率。

方法

从48项通过处方事件监测研究新上市药物的全国队列研究中收集信息。向开处方者发送问卷,询问药物处方后患者病历中记录的事件及疑似药物不良反应的详细情况。

结果

在48项队列研究中,共调查了513608名患者,其中男性221781名(43.2%),女性285862名(55.7%)。男性疑似药物不良反应的总体发生率为每10000患者月暴露量12.9例(95%置信区间12.3至13.5),女性为每10000患者月暴露量20.6例(95%置信区间19.9至21.3)。女性药物不良反应的总体年龄标准化相对风险与男性相比为1.6(1.5 - 1.7)。这种性别差异在19岁以上的所有年龄组中均显著,且在所有年龄组中相对一致(异质性卡方检验=9.2,P = 0.3)。男性记录率最高的年龄组为50 - 59岁,女性为30 - 39岁。

结论

在英格兰的全科医疗中,新上市药物的疑似药物不良反应在30至59岁的成年人中记录更为频繁,且女性比男性常见60%。这种性别差异在19岁以上的所有年龄组中均存在。

相似文献

1
Age and sex distribution of suspected adverse drug reactions to newly marketed drugs in general practice in England: analysis of 48 cohort studies.英格兰全科医疗中新上市药物疑似药物不良反应的年龄和性别分布:48项队列研究分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;46(5):505-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00817.x.
2
Age- and gender-specific asthma death rates in patients taking long-acting beta2-agonists: prescription event monitoring pharmacosurveillance studies.使用长效β2受体激动剂患者的年龄和性别特异性哮喘死亡率:处方事件监测药物警戒研究
Drug Saf. 2001;24(6):475-81. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124060-00005.
3
The rates of common adverse events reported during treatment with proton pump inhibitors used in general practice in England: cohort studies.英国全科医疗中使用质子泵抑制剂治疗期间报告的常见不良事件发生率:队列研究
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Oct;50(4):366-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00262.x.
4
Comparison of the incidence rates of thromboembolic events reported for patients prescribed rofecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using prescription-event monitoring (PEM) data.利用处方事件监测(PEM)数据,比较在英格兰全科医疗中开具罗非昔布和美洛昔康处方的患者报告的血栓栓塞事件发生率。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42(11):1342-53. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg379. Epub 2003 Jun 27.
5
Comparison of the incidence rates of thromboembolic events reported for patients prescribed celecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) data.利用处方事件监测(PEM)数据,比较在英国全科医疗中开具塞来昔布和美洛昔康处方的患者报告的血栓栓塞事件发生率。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42(11):1354-64. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg401. Epub 2003 Jul 16.
6
Comparison of the incidence rates of selected gastrointestinal events reported for patients prescribed celecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using prescription-event monitoring (PEM) data.利用处方事件监测(PEM)数据,比较在英格兰全科医疗中开具塞来昔布和美洛昔康处方的患者所报告的特定胃肠道事件的发生率。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42(11):1332-41. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg376. Epub 2003 Jun 16.
7
Safety profile of esomeprazole: results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 11 595 patients in England.埃索美拉唑的安全性概况:英国11595例患者的处方事件监测研究结果
Drug Saf. 2008;31(4):313-23. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831040-00005.
8
Prospective cohort study of adverse events monitored by hospital pharmacists. Hospital Adverse Event Monitoring Study (HAEMS) Group.医院药剂师监测不良事件的前瞻性队列研究。医院不良事件监测研究(HAEMS)组。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Mar-Apr;10(2):95-103. doi: 10.1002/pds.574.
9
Finasteride and tamsulosin used in benign prostatic hypertrophy: a review of the prescription-event monitoring data.非那雄胺和坦索罗辛用于良性前列腺增生:处方事件监测数据综述
BJU Int. 2001 Jun;87(9):789-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02207.x.
10
Comparison of the incidence rates of selected gastrointestinal events reported for patients prescribed rofecoxib and meloxicam in general practice in England using prescription-event monitoring data.利用处方事件监测数据,比较在英格兰普通医疗中开具罗非昔布和美洛昔康处方的患者所报告的特定胃肠道事件的发生率。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 May;42(5):622-31. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg141.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of potentially inappropriate medications in older adults with mortality and hospitalizations: methodological challenges in pharmacoepidemiology.老年人潜在不适当用药与死亡率和住院率的关联:药物流行病学中的方法学挑战
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01294-x.
2
Sex-Related Differences in Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review by a Multidisciplinary Task Force.慢性疼痛中的性别差异:多学科特别工作组的叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 28;61(7):1172. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071172.
3
Evidence of Sex-Related Pharmacodynamic Differences in Photosensitive Epilepsy Treated with Valproate: Findings from a Retrospective, Observational, Single-Center, Within-Patient, Cohort Study.丙戊酸盐治疗光敏性癫痫中性别相关药效学差异的证据:一项回顾性、观察性、单中心、患者内队列研究的结果
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s40801-025-00503-z.
4
Insights from a community-based survey on factors influencing acceptance and uptake of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir) as a COVID-19 antiviral medication in Singapore.基于社区的调查对影响新加坡人接受和使用帕克洛维(奈玛特韦和利托那韦)作为 COVID-19 抗病毒药物的因素的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):2332. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19687-0.
5
Competing Benefits and Competing Hazards: The Benefit to Harm Balance in Individual Patients in Rational Therapeutics.竞争获益与竞争危害:合理治疗中个体患者获益-危害平衡
Drug Saf. 2024 Aug;47(8):721-731. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01428-2. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Sex Differences in Cardiac and Clinical Phenotypes and Their Relation to Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者心脏和临床表型的性别差异及其与预后的关系。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 12;14(2):201. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020201.
7
Hypertension Related Co-Morbidities and Complications in Women of Sub-Saharan Africa: A Brief Review.撒哈拉以南非洲女性的高血压相关合并症和并发症:简要综述
Circ Res. 2024 Feb 16;134(4):459-473. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.324077. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Computational screen for sex-specific drug effects in a cardiac fibroblast signaling network model.计算筛选心脏成纤维细胞信号网络模型中的性别特异性药物作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44440-9.
9
Association between weight loss agents and elevated liver enzymes: a population-based cross-sectional study.体重管理药物与肝酶升高的关联性:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 22;13(1):15796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41908-6.
10
Adverse Drug Events by Sex After Adjusting for Baseline Rates of Drug Use.调整药物使用基线率后的药物不良事件按性别分类情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2329074. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29074.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the incidence of upper respiratory tract infection independent of drug treatment in large cohort studies of longer term use drugs?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1998 Aug;7 Suppl 1:S4-10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199808)7:1+<s4::aid-pds352>3.3.co;2-m.
2
Prescription-event monitoring (PEM) in 1996-a method of non-interventional observational cohort pharmacovigilance.1996年的处方事件监测(PEM)——一种非干预性观察性队列药物警戒方法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1997 Oct;6 Suppl 3:S5-11. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199710)6:3+<S5::AID-PDS272>3.0.CO;2-F.
3
What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice?PACT能告诉我们关于全科医疗中的处方情况有哪些信息?
BMJ. 1997 Dec 6;315(7121):1515-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1515.
4
Prescriber profile and post-marketing surveillance.处方医生概况与上市后监测
Lancet. 1993 Sep 11;342(8872):658-61. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91763-c.
5
Towards the safer use of medicines.迈向更安全的用药方式。
BMJ. 1995 Oct 14;311(7011):1003-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7011.1003.
6
Sex-related variations in the frequency and characteristics of adverse drug reactions.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1980;18(8):362-6.
7
Adverse drug reactions among the elderly: a reassessment.老年人中的药物不良反应:重新评估
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1981 Nov;29(11):525-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1981.tb03356.x.
8
Using the Adverse Reactions Register to study the effects of age and sex on adverse drug reactions.
Stat Med. 1987 Oct-Nov;6(7):863-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060716.
9
Old age--is it a risk for adverse drug reactions?
Agents Actions Suppl. 1990;29:13-25. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7292-8_3.
10
Risk factors for adverse drug reactions--epidemiological approaches.药物不良反应的风险因素——流行病学方法
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(4):321-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00315403.