van Wyk V, Neethling W M, Badenhorst P N, Kotzé H F
Department of Haematology, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1998 Oct;39(5):633-9.
Systemic anticoagulation is required during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to inhibit the activation of platelets, the coagulation system and ultimately thrombus formation. Unfractionated heparin is most commonly used, but it is neither entirely safe nor completely effective. The use of protamine sulphate to reverse the anticoagulant effect further complicates the use of heparin. The clinical need for a heparin substitute is therefore obvious. We evaluated the efficacy of r-Hirudin, a potent and specific inhibitor of thrombin, as anticoagulant in a baboon model of cardiopulmonary bypass.
Ten baboons, divided into two groups of five each, were used. The one group received 0.7 mg/kg r-Hirudin as a bolus before CPB was started, followed by a constant infusion of 1.4 mg/kg/hr for the 90 min of CPB. The other group received a bolus of 2.5 mg/kg heparin before the start of CPB, followed by maintenance dosages to maintain the activated clotting time (ACT) >400 sec.
Adequate anticoagulation was obtained with both anticoagulants. Haemodilution due to priming the extracorporeal system with Ringer's lactate and appropriately anticoagulated donor blood, was equivalent in both groups. During CPB with heparin, but not with hirudin, there was a significant increase in the number of circulating platelet aggregates, thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes and 111In-labelled platelet accumulation in the oxygenator. After the initial decrease in platelet count due to haemodilution, it further decreased significantly during CPB with heparin but remained relatively constant when r-Hirudin was used.
Our results strongly suggest that r-Hirudin is superior to heparin especially with respect to its inhibitory effect on platelet dependent thrombogenesis caused by the biomembranes of the oxygenator.
在体外循环(CPB)期间需要进行全身抗凝,以抑制血小板、凝血系统的激活,并最终抑制血栓形成。普通肝素是最常用的,但它既不完全安全也不完全有效。使用硫酸鱼精蛋白来逆转抗凝作用会使肝素的使用进一步复杂化。因此,临床对肝素替代品的需求显而易见。我们在狒狒体外循环模型中评估了重组水蛭素(一种强效且特异性的凝血酶抑制剂)作为抗凝剂的疗效。
使用10只狒狒,分为两组,每组5只。一组在CPB开始前静脉注射0.7mg/kg重组水蛭素,随后在CPB的90分钟内以1.4mg/kg/小时的速度持续输注。另一组在CPB开始前静脉注射2.5mg/kg肝素,随后给予维持剂量以维持活化凝血时间(ACT)>400秒。
两种抗凝剂均获得了充分的抗凝效果。两组中,用乳酸林格氏液和适当抗凝的供体血预充体外循环系统导致的血液稀释程度相当。在使用肝素进行CPB期间,但使用水蛭素时未出现这种情况,循环血小板聚集体、凝血酶 - 抗凝血酶(TAT)复合物的数量以及氧合器中111In标记的血小板积聚均显著增加。由于血液稀释导致血小板计数最初下降后,在使用肝素进行CPB期间血小板计数进一步显著下降,但使用重组水蛭素时血小板计数保持相对稳定。
我们的结果强烈表明,重组水蛭素优于肝素,特别是在其对氧合器生物膜引起的血小板依赖性血栓形成的抑制作用方面。