Suppr超能文献

[喉镜检查时上切牙与喉镜镜片之间距离的测定:McCoy 喉镜、Macintosh 喉镜、Miller 喉镜和 Belscope 喉镜镜片的比较]

[Determination of the distance between the upper incisors and the laryngoscope blade during laryngoscopy: comparisons of the McCoy, the Macintosh, the Miller, and the Belscope blades].

作者信息

Bito H, Nishiyama T, Higarhizawa T, Sakai T, Konishi A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Masui. 1998 Oct;47(10):1257-61.

PMID:9834604
Abstract

We compared the distance between the upper central incisors and the laryngoscope blade with the four different types of laryngoscope blade (McCoy, Macintosh, Miller, Belscope). Twenty-three patients scheduled for general anesthesia were studied. The tooth-blade distance was measured when optimum visibility of the glottis was obtained. The visibility was determined according to the Cormack and Lehane grading. The distance with the McCoy and the Belscope was greater than that with the Macintosh or the Miller. The visibility grade was significantly worse with the Macintosh than with the other types of laryngoscope. The results indicate that the McCoy and the Belscope provide less incidence of upper dental injuries and greater visibility than either with the Macintosh or the Miller. Furthermore, the force applied to the handle is thought to be smaller with the McCoy than with the Belscope.

摘要

我们比较了使用四种不同类型喉镜镜片(麦考伊喉镜、麦金托什喉镜、米勒喉镜、贝尔喉镜)时上门齿与喉镜镜片之间的距离。对23例计划接受全身麻醉的患者进行了研究。当声门获得最佳视野时,测量牙齿与镜片之间的距离。视野根据科马克和莱哈尼分级法确定。使用麦考伊喉镜和贝尔喉镜时的距离大于使用麦金托什喉镜或米勒喉镜时的距离。麦金托什喉镜的视野分级明显比其他类型的喉镜差。结果表明,与麦金托什喉镜或米勒喉镜相比,麦考伊喉镜和贝尔喉镜导致上牙损伤的发生率更低,视野更好。此外,人们认为使用麦考伊喉镜时施加在手柄上的力比使用贝尔喉镜时小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验