Suppr超能文献

酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)中的饮酒问题:老年男性初级保健患者的信度、效度及对变化的反应性

The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change in older male primary care patients.

作者信息

Bradley K A, McDonell M B, Bush K, Kivlahan D R, Diehr P, Fihn S D

机构信息

Health Services Research and Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System (Seattle Division), and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 98108, USA.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Nov;22(8):1842-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03991.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) questions 1 to 3 about alcohol consumption in a primary care setting.

PATIENTS

Randomly selected, male general medical patients (n = 441) from three VA Medical Centers, who had 5 or more drinks containing alcohol in the past year and were willing to be interviewed about their health habits.

MEASURES

Three self-administered AUDIT consumption questions were compared with a telephone-administered version of the trilevel World Health Organization interview about alcohol consumption.

RESULTS

Of 393 eligible patients, 264 (67%) completed interviews. Test-retest reliability--Correlations between baseline and repeat measures 3 months later for four dimensions of consumption according to the AUDIT, ranged from 0.65 to 0.85, among patients who indicated they had not changed their drinking (Kendall's Tau-b). Criterion validity--Correlations between AUDIT and interview for four dimensions of alcohol consumption ranged from 0.47 to 0.66 (Kendall's Tau-b). Discriminative validity--The AUDIT questions were specific (90 to 93%), but only moderately sensitive (54 to 79%), for corresponding criteria for heavy drinking. Responsiveness to change--The AUDIT consumption questions had a Guyatt responsiveness statistic of 1.04 for detecting a change of 7 drinks/week, suggesting excellent responsiveness to change.

CONCLUSIONS

AUDIT questions 1 to 3 demonstrate moderate to good validity, but excellent reliability and responsiveness to change. Although they often underestimate heavy alcohol consumption according to interview, they performed adequately to be used as a proxy measure of consumption in a clinical trial of heavy drinkers in this population.

摘要

目的

确定在初级保健环境中,酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)中关于饮酒的问题1至3的可靠性、有效性以及对变化的反应性。

患者

从三个退伍军人医疗中心随机选取的男性普通内科患者(n = 441),这些患者在过去一年中饮用含酒精饮料达5杯或更多,且愿意接受关于其健康习惯的访谈。

测量方法

将三个自我管理的AUDIT饮酒问题与由电话进行的世界卫生组织三级饮酒访谈版本进行比较。

结果

在393名符合条件的患者中,264名(67%)完成了访谈。重测信度——根据AUDIT,在表示饮酒习惯未改变的患者中(肯德尔Tau-b),3个月后基线测量与重复测量在饮酒四个维度上的相关性范围为0.65至0.85。效标效度——AUDIT与访谈在饮酒四个维度上的相关性范围为0.47至0.66(肯德尔Tau-b)。区分效度——AUDIT问题对于重度饮酒的相应标准具有较高的特异性(90%至93%),但敏感性仅为中等(54%至79%)。对变化的反应性——AUDIT饮酒问题在检测每周饮酒量变化7杯时的盖亚特反应性统计量为1.04,表明对变化具有出色的反应性。

结论

AUDIT问题1至3显示出中等至良好的有效性,但具有出色的可靠性和对变化的反应性。尽管根据访谈结果,这些问题常常低估重度饮酒情况,但在该人群中重度饮酒者的临床试验中,它们作为饮酒量的替代测量方法表现良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验