Heywood C A, Kentridge R W, Cowey A
Department of Psychology, Science Laboratories, Durham, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 1998 Nov;123(1-2):145-53. doi: 10.1007/s002210050555.
Patients with cerebral achromatopsia, resulting from damage to ventromedial occipital cortex, cannot chromatically order, or discriminate, hue. Nevertheless, their chromatic contrast sensitivity can be indistinguishable from that of normal observers. A possible contributor to the detectability of chromatic gratings is the subadditive nature of certain colour combination such that mixtures of, for example, red and green (yielding yellow) appear dimmer than expected from the simple addition of luminances. This subadditivity is believed to reflect colour-opponent interactions between the outputs of long- and medium-wavelength cones. We performed a first-order compensation for such subadditivity in chromatic gratings and demonstrated that their detection was still not abolished in an achromatopsic patient. In addition, we used a two-alternative forced-choice procedure with an achromatopsic patient, who was required to judge the apparent relative velocity of two drifting gratings with different degrees of compensation for subadditivity. It is well known that isoluminant gratings, constructed by adding a red and green sinusoidal grating of identical peak luminances in antiphase, appear to drift substantially slower than an achromatic grating with the same velocity. Adding 2f luminance compensation to an isoluminant grating of spatial frequency f, resulted in an identical minimum of perceived velocity at a compensation contrast of 5% in both achromatopsics and normal observers. Furthermore, while compensation for subadditivity did not substantially compromise grating detection at low contrasts, such correction severely affected motion detection. Saccadic eye movement accuracy and latency were also measured to uncompensated chromatic, compensated chromatic and achromatic targets. We conclude first that subadditivity, resulting from colour-opponent P-channel processes, influences motion judgements. The ability to extract motion from chromatic differences alone is little, if at all, different in achromatopsic and normal vision. Second, the paradoxical detection of sinusoidally modulated chromatic gratings in achromatopsic patients is not merely a result of subadditivity. Third, saccadic latency, but not accuracy, to chromatic targets is affected by luminance compensation. Finally, and more generally, wavelength processing continues to contribute to several aspects of visual processing even when colour is not perceived.
患有脑性全色盲的患者,因枕叶腹内侧皮质受损,无法对色调进行排序或辨别。然而,他们的色对比敏感度可能与正常观察者无异。色光栅可检测性的一个可能因素是某些颜色组合的亚相加特性,例如红色和绿色的混合(产生黄色)看起来比简单的亮度相加预期的要暗。这种亚相加性被认为反映了长波长和中波长视锥细胞输出之间的颜色拮抗相互作用。我们对色光栅的这种亚相加性进行了一阶补偿,并证明在一名全色盲患者中,色光栅的检测仍然没有被消除。此外,我们对一名全色盲患者采用了二选一强制选择程序,要求他判断两个具有不同亚相加性补偿程度的漂移光栅的表观相对速度。众所周知,通过反相添加具有相同峰值亮度的红色和绿色正弦光栅构建的等亮度光栅,其漂移速度似乎比具有相同速度的非彩色光栅慢得多。在空间频率为f的等亮度光栅上添加2f亮度补偿,在全色盲患者和正常观察者中,在5%的补偿对比度下,感知速度的最小值相同。此外,虽然在低对比度下对亚相加性的补偿并没有显著影响光栅检测,但这种校正严重影响了运动检测。还测量了对未补偿的彩色、补偿的彩色和非彩色目标的眼跳运动准确性和潜伏期。我们首先得出结论,由颜色拮抗P通道过程导致的亚相加性会影响运动判断。在全色盲和正常视觉中,仅从颜色差异中提取运动的能力即使有差异也很小。其次,全色盲患者中正弦调制色光栅的反常检测不仅仅是亚相加性的结果。第三,对彩色目标的眼跳潜伏期而非准确性受亮度补偿影响。最后,更普遍地说,即使在没有颜色感知的情况下,波长处理仍然对视觉处理的几个方面有贡献。