Horvath S, Laird N M
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Dec;63(6):1886-97. doi: 10.1086/302137.
The sibship disequilibrium test (SDT) is designed to detect both linkage in the presence of association and association in the presence of linkage (linkage disequilibrium). The test does not require parental data but requires discordant sibships with at least one affected and one unaffected sibling. The SDT has many desirable properties: it uses all the siblings in the sibship; it remains valid if there are misclassifications of the affectation status; it does not detect spurious associations due to population stratification; asymptotically it has a chi2 distribution under the null hypothesis; and exact P values can be easily computed for a biallelic marker. We show how to extend the SDT to markers with multiple alleles and how to combine families with parents and data from discordant sibships. We discuss the power of the test by presenting sample-size calculations involving a complex disease model, and we present formulas for the asymptotic relative efficiency (which is approximately the ratio of sample sizes) between SDT and the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) for special family structures. For sib pairs, we compare the SDT to a test proposed both by Curtis and, independently, by Spielman and Ewens. We show that, for discordant sib pairs, the SDT has good power for testing linkage disequilibrium relative both to Curtis's tests and to the TDT using trios comprising an affected sib and its parents. With additional sibs, we show that the SDT can be more powerful than the TDT for testing linkage disequilibrium, especially for disease prevalence >.3.
同胞不平衡检验(SDT)旨在检测存在关联时的连锁以及存在连锁时的关联(连锁不平衡)。该检验不需要亲代数据,但需要至少有一个患病同胞和一个未患病同胞的不一致同胞对。SDT具有许多理想特性:它使用同胞对中的所有同胞;如果患病状态存在错误分类,它仍然有效;它不会检测到由于群体分层导致的虚假关联;在零假设下,渐近地它具有卡方分布;对于双等位基因标记,可以轻松计算精确的P值。我们展示了如何将SDT扩展到具有多个等位基因的标记,以及如何将有父母的家庭与不一致同胞对的数据相结合。我们通过给出涉及复杂疾病模型的样本量计算来讨论检验的功效,并且我们给出了特殊家庭结构下SDT与传递/不平衡检验(TDT)之间渐近相对效率(近似为样本量之比)的公式。对于同胞对,我们将SDT与Curtis以及独立地由Spielman和Ewens提出的检验进行比较。我们表明,对于不一致的同胞对,相对于Curtis检验以及使用包含患病同胞及其父母的三联体的TDT,SDT在检验连锁不平衡方面具有良好的功效。对于额外的同胞,我们表明SDT在检验连锁不平衡方面可能比TDT更具功效,特别是对于疾病患病率>.3的情况。