Tanaka E, Sakamoto S, Kijima N, Kitamura T
Department of Sociocultural Environmental Research, National Institute of Mental Health, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan.
J Clin Psychol. 1998 Dec;54(8):1043-51. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199812)54:8<1043::aid-jclp4>3.0.co;2-a.
We examined the different personality dimensions between depression and anxiety with Cloninger's seven-factor model of temperament and character. The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), which measures four temperament and three character dimensions of Cloninger's personality theory (125-item short version), the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were administered to 223 Japanese students. With hierarchical regression analysis, the SDS score was predicted by scores of Harm-Avoidance, Self-Directedness, and Self-Transcendence, even after controlling for the STAI score. The STAI score was predicted by scores of Self-Directedness and Cooperativeness, even after controlling for the SDS score. More importance should be attached to these dimensions of character because they might contribute to both depression and anxiety.
我们使用克隆宁格的气质与性格七因素模型，研究了抑郁症和焦虑症之间不同的人格维度。我们对223名日本学生进行了气质与性格量表（TCI，该量表测量克隆宁格人格理论的四个气质维度和三个性格维度，125项简短版本）、自评抑郁量表（SDS）以及状态-特质焦虑量表（STAI）的测试。通过层次回归分析发现，即使在控制了STAI得分之后，SDS得分仍可由回避伤害、自我导向和自我超越的得分预测。即使在控制了SDS得分之后，STAI得分仍可由自我导向和合作性的得分预测。应该更加重视这些性格维度，因为它们可能对抑郁和焦虑都有影响。
