Suppr超能文献

健康与疾病状态下人体膈肌的自主激活。

Voluntary activation of the human diaphragm in health and disease.

作者信息

Sinderby C, Beck J, Spahija J, Weinberg J, Grassino A

机构信息

Guy-Bernier Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada H3A 2B2.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Dec;85(6):2146-58. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2146.

Abstract

Intersubject comparison of the crural diaphragm electromyogram, as measured by an esophageal electrode, requires a reliable means for normalizing the signal. The present study set out 1) to evaluate which voluntary respiratory maneuvers provide high and reproducible diaphragm electromyogram root-mean-square (RMS) values and 2) to determine the relative diaphragm activation and mechanical and ventilatory outputs during breathing at rest in healthy subjects (n = 5), in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, n = 5), and in restrictive patients with prior polio infection (PPI, n = 6). In all groups, mean voluntary maximal RMS values were higher during inspiration to total lung capacity than during sniff inhalation through the nose (P = 0.035, ANOVA). The RMS (percentage of voluntary maximal RMS) during quiet breathing was 8% in healthy subjects, 43% in COPD patients, and 45% in PPI patients. Despite the large difference in relative RMS (P = 0.012), there were no differences in mean transdiaphragmatic pressure (P = 0.977) and tidal volumes (P = 0.426). We conclude that voluntary maximal RMS is reliably obtained during an inspiration to total lung capacity but a sniff inhalation could be a useful complementary maneuver. Severe COPD and PPI patients breathing at rest are characterized by increased diaphragm activation with no change in diaphragm pressure generation.

摘要

通过食管电极测量的小腿膈肌肌电图的受试者间比较需要一种可靠的信号归一化方法。本研究旨在:1)评估哪些自主呼吸动作能提供高且可重复的膈肌肌电图均方根(RMS)值;2)确定健康受试者(n = 5)、重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD,n = 5)患者以及既往有脊髓灰质炎感染的限制性患者(PPI,n = 6)在静息呼吸时膈肌的相对激活情况以及机械和通气输出。在所有组中,吸气至肺总量时的平均自主最大RMS值高于经鼻吸气时(P = 0.035,方差分析)。健康受试者静息呼吸时的RMS(自主最大RMS的百分比)为8%,COPD患者为43%,PPI患者为45%。尽管相对RMS差异很大(P = 0.012),但平均跨膈压(P = 0.977)和潮气量(P = 0.426)并无差异。我们得出结论,吸气至肺总量时可可靠地获得自主最大RMS,但经鼻吸气可能是一种有用的补充动作。重度COPD和PPI患者静息呼吸时的特点是膈肌激活增加,而膈肌压力产生无变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验