• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe postulated by Polish professionals.

作者信息

Indulski J A, Boczkowski A, Mikulski M

机构信息

School of Public Health, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lódź, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(3):255-65.

PMID:9844308
Abstract

In order to determine common key competences required for occupational medicine specialists across Europe, a questionnaire has been developed and disseminated in several European countries. The questionnaire contained 115 subjects relating to eight fields of activity of an occupational medicine physician (occupational hazards to health, assessment of disability and fitness for work, communications, research methods, management, environmental medicine, occupational health law and ethics, and health promotion). Items in each part were classified into three categories: knowledge, experience and skills. For each of the subjects respondents were asked to allocate a score from 0 to 5, where 0 = not necessary, 1 = of minimal importance and 5 = most important or essential. In Poland the questionnaire was distributed between two groups of specialists: group I--chief administrators of occupational health services, and group II--relatively younger occupational medicine physicians participating in a specialist training. A comprehensive analysis of the completed questionnaires had three dimensions: (a) substantive (classification of the importance of particular key competences, as perceived by Polish specialists in occupational medicine), (b) personal (differences in opinions among occupational medicine physicians and an attempt to explain these differences in sociological terms), (c) comparative (evaluation and interpretation of similarities and differences between two groups). A hierarchy of requirements for occupational medicine training in Poland was constructed, with one set of competences recognized by the respondents as needless and others as useful with different grade of importance. Surprisingly, a wide diversity of opinions among respondents has given rise to the explanation hypotheses, some of them being verified using the material gathered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe postulated by Polish professionals.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(3):255-65.
2
The competences postulated as requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe as viewed by Polish specialists.波兰专家眼中欧洲职业医学培训所需具备的能力要求。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2001;14(1):63-9.
3
[Attitudes of Polish occupational medicine physicians towards a proposal of requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe].[波兰职业医学医生对欧洲职业医学培训要求提案的态度]
Med Pr. 1998;49(5):423-38.
4
[Monitoring and evaluation of effectiveness of the postgraduate training in occupational hygiene].
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2005;51 Suppl 1:21-7.
5
[Occupational medicine within the occupational health system: the evolution of specialist training].职业健康体系中的职业医学:专科培训的演变
Med Pr. 2007;58(5):457-66.
6
Self-assessment of the competences in occupational medicine as an instrument for improving postgraduate training.职业医学能力的自我评估作为改进研究生培训的一种手段。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2000;13(2):91-101.
7
Opinions of Polish occupational medicine physicians on workplace health promotion.波兰职业医学医师对工作场所健康促进的看法。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2005;18(3):241-9.
8
[Comparison of the training schemes of the specialization schools of the public health area: a rational basis for a proposal of a core curriculum for the university training programme contained in article 38 of Legislative Decree (D.Lgs) 81/2008].[公共卫生领域专业学校培训方案比较:为2008年第81号立法令(D.Lgs)第38条所载大学培训计划核心课程提案提供合理依据]
Med Lav. 2010 Jan-Feb;101(1):55-72.
9
The Occupational Medicine agenda: routes and standards of specialization in Occupational Medicine in Europe.职业医学议程:欧洲职业医学专业化的途径与标准
Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Jun;55(4):308-11. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi059.
10
[Methods and results of the assessment of efficacy of postgraduate students in public health].[公共卫生专业研究生效能评估的方法与结果]
Wiad Lek. 2002;55 Suppl 1:34-42.