Axial pen force increases with processing demands in handwriting.

In two experiments, during handwriting movements, the on-line visual feedback of either slant (Experiment 1) or size (Experiment 2) was transformed to study the time course and biomechanics of the participants' compensations for these distortions. Fluency, movement time, and axial pen force were measured. According to our theory, changing the scaling factor of slant or size is equivalent to a processing demand that is reflected in deteriorated signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in the neuromotor system. At the behavioral level, deteriorated SNRs will result in less fluent writing, which can be compensated by applying a biomechanical noise-filtering strategy of increased limb stiffness. This strategy will lead to increased axial pen force, and, with higher degrees of difficulty, to a loss of movement speed. Results revealed decrements in writing fluency together with increments in axial pen force and increments in movement time when compensations to the feedback transformations coincided with the more difficult task conditions. These findings contrast with the traditional resource theory (Kahneman, 1973) in which chronometric measures alone indicate increased processing demands.