• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道德自主的实践?

Morally autonomous practice?

作者信息

Scott P A

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Stirling, Scotland.

出版信息

ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1998 Dec;21(2):69-79. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199812000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00012272-199812000-00008
PMID:9845488
Abstract

The structures and contexts within which nurses work results in the moral agency and moral autonomy of the nurse being compromised. This claim results from a confusion of (1) the concept of autonomy with those of freedom and independence; and (2) a confusion of the notion of moral autonomy with that of autonomous professional practice. The drawing of appropriate distinctions allows clarification of the relevant concepts. It also underlines the responsibility of practitioners to recognize the moral dimension of their practice, and the moral implications of their actions, as they attempt to meet the health care needs of their patients and develop practice professionally.

摘要

护士工作的结构和环境导致护士的道德能动性和道德自主性受到损害。这一说法源于对以下两点的混淆:(1)自主性概念与自由和独立概念的混淆;(2)道德自主性概念与自主专业实践概念的混淆。进行适当区分有助于澄清相关概念。这也强调了从业者在努力满足患者的医疗保健需求并专业地发展实践时,认识到其实践的道德维度及其行为的道德影响的责任。

相似文献

1
Morally autonomous practice?道德自主的实践?
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1998 Dec;21(2):69-79. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199812000-00008.
2
Nursing's most pressing moral issue.护理领域最紧迫的道德问题。
Bioethics Forum. 1994 Winter;10(1):3-9.
3
Professional caring: the moral dimension.专业关怀:道德维度
J Adv Nurs. 1995 Dec;22(6):1135-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb03115.x.
4
Midwives, their employers and the UKCC: an eternally unethical triangle.助产士、她们的雇主与英国中央助产士委员会:一个永远不道德的三角关系。
Nurs Ethics. 1995 Sep;2(3):247-53. doi: 10.1177/096973309500200308.
5
Professional codes: an exercise in tokenism?专业准则:一种形式主义的做法?
Nurs Ethics. 1994 Mar;1(1):15-23. doi: 10.1177/096973309400100103.
6
Autonomy and clinical practice. 1: Identifying areas of concern.
Br J Nurs. 2000;9(8):507-13. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2000.9.8.6309.
7
The virtue of nursing: the covenant of care.护理的美德:护理之约。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):477-81. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.477.
8
Autonomy, accountability and nursing practice.自主性、问责制与护理实践。
Top Clin Nurs. 1982 Apr;4(2):7-14.
9
On nursing, moral autonomy, and moral responsibility.论护理、道德自主性与道德责任。
Medsurg Nurs. 2005 Dec;14(6):395-8.
10
Moral stress: synthesis of a concept.道德压力:一个概念的综合
Nurs Ethics. 2003 May;10(3):312-22. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne608oa.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient autonomy and choice in healthcare: self-testing devices as a case in point.医疗保健中的患者自主权与选择:以自我检测设备为例。
Med Health Care Philos. 2012 Nov;15(4):383-95. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9356-6.