Oger P, Katz V, Lecorre N, Beaufils P
Service d'Orthopédie Traumatologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998 Oct;84(6):539-45.
The sliding plate has appeared to be a reliable answer for trochanteric fractures. However, impaction allowed by the material may, have an adverse effect (medialisation, shortening, jutting out of the lag screw). The aim of our study was to measure the sliding of the screw in order to assess the impaction in various types of fracture, according to the Ender classification.
Hundred trochanteric fractures have been treated between 1991 and 1993. Eighty four have been analyzed with a follow-up of three months after surgery. The average age was 80.1 years with a 4.2 sex ratio (16 males). One hundred and thirty five degrees free sliding plates were employed for fracture fixation. Full weight bearing was allowed in 78.6 per cent of patients. According to Ender classification, 35 per cent of fractures were type 1, 4 or 5. This was the first group. The second group consisted of types 2 and 3 and the third group of types 6, 7 and 8. The results were assessed on AP and lateral X-rays. The ratio between screw thread length (constant) and screw outside the barrel length, was used to measure impaction on AP view. Osteoporosis was evaluated according to Singh.
Despite two screw protrusions out of the femoral head and two failures of the plate, we have observed a healing rate of 100 per cent after three months. Sliding averaged 6.2 mm in group 1, 10.5 mm in group 2 and 16.4 mm in groupe 3. Weight bearing had a low influence on the amount of sliding.
Group 1 consists of fractures (types 1, 4 and 5) which are two parts fractures considered as stable. Group 2 corresponds to types 2 and 3 considered as intermediate fractures with relative stability. In group 3 (types 6, 7 and 8) we have observed major fracture instability. Osteoporosis does not seem to be the major factor regarding screw sliding.
The sliding plate is reliable. However, complex fractures healed in a wrong position which is definitely not acceptable, especially for young patients. Therefore, we advise to avoid the use of sliding plate in case of Ender type 6, 7 and 8.
滑动钢板似乎是治疗转子间骨折的可靠方法。然而,材料允许的嵌插可能会产生不利影响(拉力螺钉内移、缩短、穿出)。我们研究的目的是根据恩德勒分类法测量螺钉的滑动情况,以评估不同类型骨折中的嵌插情况。
1991年至1993年间治疗了100例转子间骨折。对其中84例进行了分析,术后随访3个月。平均年龄为80.1岁,男女比例为4.2(16例男性)。采用135°自由滑动钢板进行骨折固定。78.6%的患者允许完全负重。根据恩德勒分类法,35%的骨折为1型、4型或5型。这是第一组。第二组包括2型和3型,第三组包括6型、7型和8型。通过前后位和侧位X线片评估结果。用螺纹长度(固定值)与套筒外螺钉长度的比值来测量前后位片上的嵌插情况。根据辛格法评估骨质疏松情况。
尽管有2枚螺钉穿出股骨头,2块钢板失效,但我们观察到3个月后的愈合率为100%。第一组平均滑动6.2mm,第二组为10.5mm,第三组为16.4mm。负重对滑动量的影响较小。
第一组包括1型、4型和5型骨折,属于被认为稳定的两部分骨折。第二组对应2型和3型,被认为是具有相对稳定性的中间型骨折。在第三组(6型、7型和8型)中,我们观察到骨折严重不稳定。骨质疏松似乎不是影响螺钉滑动的主要因素。
滑动钢板是可靠的。然而,复杂骨折在错误位置愈合,这绝对是不可接受的,尤其是对年轻患者。因此,我们建议在恩德勒6型、7型和8型骨折的情况下避免使用滑动钢板。