Olsson O
Department of Orthopedics, Helsingborg Hospital, SE-251 87 Helsingborg, Sweden.
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2000 Oct;295:1-31.
In allowing compression along the femoral shaft (uniaxial dynamization) and optional compression along the femoral neck (biaxial dynamization), the Medoff sliding plate (MSP) represents a new principle in the fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. The Twin hook with 2 apical hooks was designed as an alternative to the lag screw. In 3 prospective consecutive case series and 1 prospective randomized study together comprising 342 trochanteric fractures, these alternative techniques were investigated. 3 postoperative fixation failures occurred in the unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with biaxial dynamization with the MSP (n = 194), and 5 in those treated with the sliding hip screw (n = 62) (p = 0.04). A mean femoral shortening of 15 mm with the MSP and 11 mm with the sliding hip screw was found (p = 0.03). More medialization of the femoral shaft occurred with the sliding hip screw (26%) than with the MSP (12%) in patients with marked femoral shortening (p = 0.03). 3 postoperative fixation failures occurred in subtrochanteric fractures treated with uniaxial dynamization (n = 29) and 2 in those treated with biaxial dynamization (n = 19). Medialization of the femoral shaft occurred in 9 of the 19 biaxially dynamized fractures. The Twin hook was used in 50 patients and appeared to provide similar fixation stability as the lag screw. Biomechanical tests confirmed improved stress transmission over the fracture area with the MSP compared to the sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures, and similar fixation stability with the MSP and the Intramedullary Hip Screw in subtrochanteric fractures. In axial and torsional loading, the Twin hook demonstrated gradually increasing resistance to migration. With the lag screw, the peak load was higher, but after migration with failure of the support by the threads, the loads were similar. Biaxial dynamization with the MSP appears to control fracture impaction effectively and minimizes the rate of postoperative fixation failure in intertrochanteric fractures. In subtrochanteric fractures, uniaxial dynamization prevents medialization of the femoral shaft and is therefore preferred to biaxial dynamization. The Twin hook appears to provide adequate fixation stability, and with potential for simplified intraoperative handling and reduced dissection, the Twin hook may pose advantages compared to the lag screw.
Medoff滑动钢板(MSP)在股骨转子间骨折固定方面代表了一种新的理念,它允许沿股骨干进行加压(单轴动力化),并可选择沿股骨颈进行加压(双轴动力化)。带有2个尖钩的双钩被设计为拉力螺钉的替代物。在3个连续的前瞻性病例系列和1个前瞻性随机研究中,共纳入了342例转子间骨折,对这些替代技术进行了研究。采用MSP双轴动力化治疗的不稳定转子间骨折(n = 194)中有3例术后固定失败,采用滑动髋螺钉治疗的(n = 62)中有5例(p = 0.04)。发现采用MSP时股骨干平均短缩15 mm,采用滑动髋螺钉时平均短缩11 mm(p = 0.03)。在股骨干明显短缩的患者中,采用滑动髋螺钉时股骨干内移(26%)比采用MSP时(12%)更明显(p = 0.03)。采用单轴动力化治疗的转子下骨折(n = 29)中有3例术后固定失败,采用双轴动力化治疗的(n = 19)中有2例。在19例采用双轴动力化的骨折中有9例出现股骨干内移。双钩在50例患者中使用,似乎提供了与拉力螺钉相似的固定稳定性。生物力学测试证实,与滑动髋螺钉相比,MSP在转子间骨折中改善了骨折区域的应力传递,在转子下骨折中,MSP与髓内髋螺钉的固定稳定性相似。在轴向和扭转加载时,双钩对移位的抵抗力逐渐增加。使用拉力螺钉时,峰值负荷更高,但在螺纹失去支撑而移位后,负荷相似。采用MSP双轴动力化似乎能有效控制骨折嵌插,并使转子间骨折术后固定失败率降至最低。在转子下骨折中,单轴动力化可防止股骨干内移,因此比双轴动力化更可取。双钩似乎提供了足够的固定稳定性,并且由于术中操作可能简化且解剖范围减小,与拉力螺钉相比,双钩可能具有优势。