Suppr超能文献

不同检测方法间血清转铁蛋白受体测量值的差异。

Disparity of serum transferrin receptor measurements among different assay methods.

作者信息

Yeung G S, Kjarsgaard J C, Zlotkin S H

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Nov;52(11):801-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600650.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To highlight differences in the quantification of transferrin receptor (TfR) concentration (a reliable index of iron deficiency) between three different assay methods.

DESIGN

Methods comparison of TfR measurements in 'elevated' and 'normal' human sera using the Ramco, Quantikine and 'Lab' assays.

SETTING

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

SUBJECTS

Pooled TfR for elevated and normal human sera obtained from the Ramco TfR assay kit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences between TfR concentrations in normal and elevated samples and repeatability for each assay method and limits of agreement in TfR quantification between assay methods.

RESULTS

The mean TfR concentrations for the elevated reference serum samples was higher than the normal reference samples within each individual assay (P < 0.001); however, measurement agreement between methods was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of the relative differences in the values obtained from each of the assays should affect the interpretation of TfR concentration as an index of iron deficiency.

摘要

目的

强调三种不同检测方法在转铁蛋白受体(TfR)浓度(缺铁的可靠指标)定量方面的差异。

设计

使用Ramco、Quantikine和“实验室”检测方法对“升高”和“正常”人血清中的TfR测量值进行方法比较。

地点

加拿大多伦多病童医院。

研究对象

从Ramco TfR检测试剂盒获得的用于“升高”和“正常人血清”的混合TfR。

主要观察指标

正常和升高样本中TfR浓度的差异、每种检测方法的重复性以及检测方法之间TfR定量的一致性界限。

结果

在每种单独的检测中,升高的参考血清样本的平均TfR浓度高于正常参考样本(P < 0.001);然而,各方法之间的测量一致性较差。

结论

认识到每种检测所获得值的相对差异应会影响将TfR浓度作为缺铁指标的解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验