Rembiałkowska E
Zakład Ekologicznych Metod Produkcji Zywności, SGGW, Warszawa.
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1998;49(2):159-67.
The aim of work was to compare nutritional quality and wholesomeness of the potatoes from ecological (ECO) and conventional (CONV) farms. Other aim was to check if the west-european data telling about better nutritional quality of ECO potatoes can be confirmed in Polish agricultural conditions. Nine ECO farms located in Toruń and Sieradz provinces, having EKOLAND's certification were selected to study. A neighbour CONV farm with similar production conditions was selected to each ECO farm. ECO farmers manured potatoes with composted cow manure or compost giving on average 30 t/ha. CONV farmers used mineral fertilizers NPK in 1:1:1,5 ratio giving 100 kg N/ha. In the autumn several compounds were determined in potatoes: the contents of dry matter according to PN-88/R-04013, the contents of nitrates and nitrites according to Draft International Standard ISO, the contents of Pb and Cd by means of ASA method and the contents of vitamin C as L-ascorbic acid according to PN-90/A-75101/11. The ECO potatoes contained in both years significantly less nitrates than CONV potatoes. In 1992 the nitrates contents was much higher in both kinds of potatoes than in 1993. The nitrites contents was in both years higher in CONV potatoes but the difference was statistically significant only in 1993. The lead contents was low in both kinds of potatoes and didn't exceed permissible level. The cadmium contents was in 1992 significantly higher in CONV tubers than in ECO tubers and exceeded permissible level. In 1991 and 1993 both kinds of tubers contained similar cadmium levels. The contents of dry matter and vitamin C was similar in both kinds of tubers. The study has shown that ECO potatoes were more wholesome than CONV potatoes. The results obtained in Polish agricultural conditions confirmed west-european data.
这项工作的目的是比较生态农场(ECO)和传统农场(CONV)种植的土豆的营养品质和安全性。另一个目的是检验在波兰农业条件下,西欧有关生态土豆营养品质更佳的数据是否能够得到证实。研究选取了位于托伦和希隆斯克省的9个获得EKOLAND认证的生态农场。为每个生态农场挑选了一个生产条件相似的邻近传统农场。生态农场的农民用堆肥牛粪或堆肥给土豆施肥,平均施用量为30吨/公顷。传统农场的农民使用比例为1:1:1.5的氮磷钾矿物肥料,施用量为100千克氮/公顷。秋季时,对土豆中的几种化合物进行了测定:按照PN-88/R-04013测定干物质含量,按照国际标准草案ISO测定硝酸盐和亚硝酸盐含量,采用ASA方法测定铅和镉含量,按照PN-90/A-75101/11测定维生素C(以L-抗坏血酸形式)含量。在这两年中,生态土豆中的硝酸盐含量均显著低于传统土豆。1992年,两种土豆中的硝酸盐含量均远高于1993年。传统土豆中的亚硝酸盐含量在这两年中均较高,但仅在1993年差异具有统计学意义。两种土豆中的铅含量都很低,未超过允许水平。1992年,传统块茎中的镉含量显著高于生态块茎,且超过了允许水平。1991年和1993年,两种块茎中的镉含量相似。两种块茎中的干物质和维生素C含量相似。研究表明,生态土豆比传统土豆更安全。在波兰农业条件下获得的结果证实了西欧的数据。