Suppr超能文献

鲎试剂是严重热损伤中脓毒症发作的唯一预测指标吗?

Is the limulus amebocyte lysate the sole predictor of septic episodes in major thermal injuries?

作者信息

Heggers J P, Goodheart R, Carino E, McCoy L, Ramirez R J, Maness C

机构信息

Shriners Hospital for Children, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998 Nov-Dec;19(6):512-5. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199811000-00009.

Abstract

Septic episodes in thermal injuries are usually hallmarked by a series of physiologic parameters that include tachypnea, prolonged paralytic ileus, hyperthermia or hypothermia, altered mental status, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis or unexplained leukopenia, acidosis, and hyperglycemia. Recent studies with polycystic kidney disease have clearly indicated that the limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assays were predictive of fungal infections in this patient population. Because both bacteria and fungi produce lipopolysaccharide that can be identified with the LAL assay, we randomly assayed sequential sera of 45 patients with major thermal injuries for positivity in the LAL assay, with use of the QCL-1000 kit (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, Md). The average burn size of this patient population was 63.43% total body surface area. The average age of the patient was 6.2 years. The sex distribution included 30 males and 15 females. The infectious agents included gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods, and 14 patients had concomitant fungal infections. Eighty-five percent of the patients tested were positive for endotoxin, with levels ranging from < 0.1 EU/mL to > 1.0 EU/mL. The predominant organism isolated before or on the date the serum was drawn was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (51%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (15%). The remaining 34% were a variety of Enterobacteriaceae. Of the 14 patients who yielded a fungus, 3 had negative LAL assays. Two patients with an elevated LAL grew only Staphylococcus epidermidis in the bloodstream and the wounds. These data clearly indicate that the LAL assay cannot be relied on as the sole predictor of septic episodes; however, it can be an adjunctive test to confirm sepsis when the other parameters have been considered.

摘要

热损伤患者的脓毒症发作通常以一系列生理参数为特征,这些参数包括呼吸急促、麻痹性肠梗阻持续时间延长、体温过高或过低、精神状态改变、血小板减少、白细胞增多或不明原因的白细胞减少、酸中毒和高血糖。最近关于多囊肾病的研究清楚地表明,鲎试剂检测可预测该患者群体中的真菌感染。由于细菌和真菌都会产生可通过鲎试剂检测识别的脂多糖,我们使用QCL - 1000试剂盒(BioWhittaker公司,马里兰州沃克维尔),对45例重度热损伤患者的连续血清进行随机鲎试剂检测,以确定其阳性情况。该患者群体的平均烧伤面积为体表面积的63.43%。患者的平均年龄为6.2岁。性别分布为30名男性和15名女性。感染病原体包括革兰氏阳性球菌和革兰氏阴性杆菌,14例患者同时合并真菌感染。85%的检测患者内毒素呈阳性,水平范围从<0.1 EU/mL至>1.0 EU/mL。在采血前或采血当天分离出的主要病原体是铜绿假单胞菌(51%),其次是肺炎克雷伯菌(15%)。其余34%为各种肠杆菌科细菌。在14例培养出真菌的患者中,3例鲎试剂检测为阴性。2例鲎试剂检测结果升高的患者,血液和伤口中仅培养出表皮葡萄球菌。这些数据清楚地表明,鲎试剂检测不能作为脓毒症发作的唯一预测指标;然而,在考虑了其他参数后,它可作为确认脓毒症的辅助检测方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验