Sheraba Norhan S, Diab Mohamed R, Yassin Aymen S, Amin Magdy A, Zedan Hamdallah H
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia;
VACSERA, The Holding Company for Biological Products and Vaccines, Giza, Egypt; and.
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2019 Nov-Dec;73(6):562-571. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2018.009522. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
The only definitive management of snake envenoming is the use of snake antivenom. Endotoxin contamination is a serious threat to the safe use of parenteral drugs. A greater understanding of the nature of limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) test interference and use of permissible dilutions has minimized enhancement problems. Common interference issues include suboptimal pH, enzyme or protein modification, and nonspecific LAL activation. This study aimed at determining the interference factors associated with validating the antivenom sera preparations to avoid false-positive results when testing snake antivenom serum samples by the LAL method. Phase I (preliminary screening/interference assay) was performed to determine a compatible test dilution, which was then used in Phase II (inhibition-enhancement/validation study). The best approach to resolve interference issues was dilution by 1:80 (maximum valid dilution) plus a specific treatment as heat-activation at 70°C-80°C for 10 min with rehydration of LAL reagent with endotoxin-specific buffer solution. Snake antivenom sera are produced by immunizing horses with repeated nonlethal doses of snake venom. Bacterial endotoxins constitute one of the major problems in the formulation of pharmaceutical products. One such method for detecting endotoxin levels is the bacterial endotoxin test (BET). However, some substances show strong interfering action with the BET that cannot be avoided by simply diluting the sample solution. In this work, the test for interfering factors was performed as two identical series of product dilutions-one spiked with 2λ and one left unspiked. The result of the interference test revealed the noninterfering dilution (NID) of the product, which was used for the actual validation. Our results showed that after treating the samples using different procedures, such as heat activation at 70-80°C for 10 min followed by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 10 min and dilution of samples in BD100 (biodispersing agent), inhibition and enhancement up to 1:100 maximum valid dilution (MVD) were observed. Finally, to resolve this inhibition/enhancement problem, the activated sample was heated at 70-80°C for 10 min with rehydration of the Endosafe LAL reagent in an endotoxin-specific buffer solution (BG120) to block β-d-glucans and limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) reactive material (LAL-RM).
蛇咬伤中毒的唯一确定性治疗方法是使用蛇毒抗毒素。内毒素污染是注射用药物安全使用的严重威胁。对鲎试剂(LAL)检测干扰性质的更深入了解以及允许稀释度的使用已将增强问题降至最低。常见的干扰问题包括pH值不理想、酶或蛋白质修饰以及非特异性LAL激活。本研究旨在确定与验证抗毒素血清制剂相关的干扰因素,以避免在用LAL方法检测蛇抗毒素血清样本时出现假阳性结果。第一阶段(初步筛选/干扰测定)用于确定合适的检测稀释度,然后在第二阶段(抑制-增强/验证研究)中使用。解决干扰问题的最佳方法是以1:80(最大有效稀释度)进行稀释,并进行特定处理,如在70°C-80°C加热激活10分钟,并用内毒素特异性缓冲溶液复溶LAL试剂。蛇抗毒素血清是通过用重复的非致死剂量蛇毒免疫马匹产生的。细菌内毒素是药品制剂中的主要问题之一。检测内毒素水平的一种方法是细菌内毒素检测(BET)。然而,一些物质对BET有强烈的干扰作用,无法通过简单稀释样品溶液来避免。在这项工作中,干扰因素检测是通过两个相同系列的产品稀释液进行的——一个加入2λ内毒素,一个未加。干扰试验结果揭示了产品的无干扰稀释度(NID),用于实际验证。我们的结果表明,在用不同程序处理样品后,如在70-80°C加热激活10分钟,然后以2000转/分钟离心10分钟,并在BD100(生物分散剂)中稀释样品,观察到抑制和增强作用可达1:100最大有效稀释度(MVD)。最后,为了解决这种抑制/增强问题,将激活后的样品在70-80°C加热10分钟,并用内毒素特异性缓冲溶液(BG120)复溶Endosafe LAL试剂,以阻断β-d-葡聚糖和鲎试剂(LAL)反应性物质(LAL-RM)。