Ferlauto J J, Walker M W, Martin M S
Neonatal Developmental Follow-Up Clinic, Children's Hospital, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.
J Perinatol. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6 Pt 1):455-9.
The principal objective of this retrospective, cohort study was to determine if clinically significant gastroesophageal reflux (GER) would impair the long-term cognitive and motor development of preterm infants. An additional objective was to determine the effects of clinically significant GER on the length of hospital stay and total hospital charges in preterm infants.
The design was a retrospective, cohort study of 66 preterm infants, followed in the Neonatal Developmental Follow-Up Clinic of The Children's Hospital in Greenville, SC. Thirty-three premature infants with clinically significant GER met the following study criteria: birth dates, 1988 through 1994; lack of gastrointestinal anatomic defects; and lack of acute neurologic injury (defined as no intraventricular hemorrhage greater than Papile's grade I, no periventricular leukomalacia, no seizures, and no history of birth asphyxia). Clinically significant GER was defined as GER associated with moderate to severe apnea (n=29) or GER associated with moderate to severe feeding intolerance (n=4). The study patients were matched as closely as possible with 33 control premature infants for sex (except when twins were used), ethnicity, social risk, gestational age, birth weight, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes. Social risk was categorized using Hack's Social Risk Scale. Important covariates included apnea, home monitoring, and nasal continuous positive airway pressure.
Neurodevelopmental test scores from 7 months of age through 2 years of age did not show any significant differences between premature infants with clinically significant GER and premature infants with no evidence of clinically significant GER. Total hospital charges were statistically different for the clinically significant GER infants and the nonclinically significant GER infants (median $112,916 versus median $63,928, p=0.01). Total neonatal intensive care unit length of stay measures were statistically different between the two groups (median 53 days versus median 40.5 days, p=0.01).
Even though clinically significant GER may pose a substantial medical risk in premature infants, the long-term cognitive consequences appear to be negligible. Nevertheless, those premature infants with clinically significant GER do consume significantly more hospital resources than matched controls. Early diagnosis and intervention may possibly lessen the impact of medical costs and reduce length of hospital stay.
这项回顾性队列研究的主要目的是确定具有临床意义的胃食管反流(GER)是否会损害早产儿的长期认知和运动发育。另一个目的是确定具有临床意义的GER对早产儿住院时间和总住院费用的影响。
该研究设计为对66名早产儿进行的回顾性队列研究,这些早产儿在南卡罗来纳州格林维尔市儿童医院的新生儿发育随访诊所接受随访。33名患有具有临床意义的GER的早产儿符合以下研究标准:出生日期为1988年至1994年;无胃肠道解剖缺陷;无急性神经损伤(定义为脑室内出血不超过帕皮勒I级、无脑室周围白质软化、无癫痫发作且无出生窒息史)。具有临床意义的GER定义为与中度至重度呼吸暂停相关的GER(n = 29)或与中度至重度喂养不耐受相关的GER(n = 4)。研究患者尽可能与33名对照早产儿在性别(双胞胎情况除外)、种族、社会风险、胎龄、出生体重以及1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分方面进行匹配。社会风险使用哈克社会风险量表进行分类。重要的协变量包括呼吸暂停、家庭监测和经鼻持续气道正压通气。
7个月至2岁的神经发育测试分数在患有具有临床意义的GER的早产儿和无具有临床意义的GER证据的早产儿之间没有显示出任何显著差异。具有临床意义的GER婴儿和无临床意义的GER婴儿的总住院费用在统计学上存在差异(中位数分别为112,916美元和63,928美元,p = 0.01)。两组之间新生儿重症监护病房的总住院时间在统计学上存在差异(中位数分别为53天和40.5天,p = 0.01)。
尽管具有临床意义的GER可能给早产儿带来重大医疗风险,但其长期认知后果似乎可以忽略不计。然而,那些患有具有临床意义的GER的早产儿确实比匹配的对照组消耗更多的医院资源。早期诊断和干预可能会减轻医疗费用的影响并缩短住院时间。