Simpson P D, Martin C J, Darragh C L, Abel R
Wessex Regional Medical Physics Department, Royal United Hospital, Bath, Avon, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1998 Jun;71(846):640-5. doi: 10.1259/bjr.71.846.9849388.
A survey of radiographic technique and estimated entrance surface dose has been carried out for 364 chest radiographs performed with mobile X-ray equipment in the Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) and 30 wards at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. Data for these two types of location were compared, as were those for two film/screen systems used on the wards. Image quality assessments were made on sets of radiographs for two patients. Entrance skin doses for chest radiographs performed in the ITU were 50% greater than on the wards with the same film/screen system. The main technique difference was the use of shorter focus-to-skin distances (FSDs) in ITU. Doses with the Kodak Insight system were 20% higher than those using Du Pont Quanta III in similar locations. No correlation was found between image quality and entrance surface dose (ESD). Results from the survey were used to recommend exposure factors for shorter FSDs. A follow-up study revealed a 35-45% reduction in ESD for Kodak Insight and a 20% reduction for Quanta III.
对阿伯丁皇家医院重症监护病房(ITU)和30个病房中使用移动X射线设备进行的364例胸部X光片的射线照相技术和估计的体表入射剂量进行了调查。比较了这两种地点的数据,以及病房中使用的两种胶片/屏幕系统的数据。对两名患者的X光片进行了图像质量评估。在ITU进行的胸部X光片的体表入射剂量比使用相同胶片/屏幕系统的病房高50%。主要技术差异在于ITU使用了更短的焦点到皮肤距离(FSD)。在类似地点,柯达Insight系统的剂量比使用杜邦Quanta III的剂量高20%。未发现图像质量与体表入射剂量(ESD)之间存在相关性。调查结果被用于推荐更短FSD的曝光因素。一项后续研究表明,柯达Insight的ESD降低了35 - 45%,Quanta III降低了20%。