Hawighorst H, Schaeffer U, Knapstein P G, Knopp M V, Weikel W, Schönberg S O, Essig M, van Kaick G
Deutschen Krebsforschungszentrums (dkfz), Heidelberg.
Rofo. 1998 Nov;169(5):499-504. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015327.
Purpose of this study is to compare functional MRI parameters with histomorphological markers of tumor microvessel density (MVD) and permeability (vascular endothelial growth factor) and to determine the ultimate value of both approaches by correlation with disease outcome in patients with primary cancer of the uterine cervix.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging series in 37 patients with biopsy-proven primary cervical cancer. On the operative whole mount specimens, histomorphological markers of tumor angiogenesis (MVD, VEGF) were compared with the MRI-derived parameters. For MRI and histomorphological data, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and compared using logrank statistics.
Significant (p < 0.05-0.01) associations were found between MVD and dynamic MRI parameters. No significant relationships were observed between VEGF expression and dynamic MRI parameters. Disease outcome was better assessed with dynamic MRI parameters than with the histomorphological approach.
It is concluded that 1) the pathophysiological basis for the amplitude A in dynamic MRI is MVD but not VEGF expression; and 2) a functional, dynamic MRI approach may be more suited to assess angiogenic activity in terms of patient survival than current histomorphological-based markers of tumor angiogenesis.
本研究旨在比较功能磁共振成像(fMRI)参数与肿瘤微血管密度(MVD)及通透性(血管内皮生长因子)的组织形态学标志物,并通过与子宫颈原发性癌患者的疾病预后进行相关性分析,确定这两种方法的最终价值。
从37例经活检证实为原发性宫颈癌的患者的对比增强动态磁共振成像系列中计算药代动力学参数。在手术切除的整块标本上,将肿瘤血管生成的组织形态学标志物(MVD、VEGF)与磁共振成像衍生参数进行比较。对于磁共振成像和组织形态学数据,计算Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,并使用对数秩统计进行比较。
在MVD与动态磁共振成像参数之间发现了显著(p < 0.05 - 0.01)的关联。未观察到VEGF表达与动态磁共振成像参数之间存在显著关系。与组织形态学方法相比,动态磁共振成像参数能更好地评估疾病预后。
得出以下结论:1)动态磁共振成像中振幅A的病理生理基础是MVD而非VEGF表达;2)就患者生存而言,功能性动态磁共振成像方法可能比当前基于组织形态学的肿瘤血管生成标志物更适合评估血管生成活性。