Versi E, Harvey M A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(5):271-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01901505.
The efficacy of a new external anti-incontinence device in patients with a videourodynamic diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence (GSI) in an open longitudinal study is reported. Fourteen women with GSI underwent assessment before and after 3-4 weeks of device use. Assessment consisted of visual analog scores (VAS), quality of life (QOL) questionnaires, urine for culture and a 1 hour pad test. VAS scores showed a significant improvement for the symptom of stress incontinence (P<0.05). QOL scores improved significantly by 38% (P<0.05) and 29% (P<0.01) for the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and Urogenital Distress Inventory, respectively. The mean pad weight decreased by 47% (P=0.056). Of the 9 women who had a positive pad test (>2 g) without the device, 5 were dry (<2 g) with the device (P<0.05). These preliminary data suggest that this device is effective in women with GSI.
在一项开放性纵向研究中，报告了一种新型外部抗尿失禁装置对经视频尿动力学诊断为真性压力性尿失禁（GSI）患者的疗效。14名GSI女性患者在使用该装置3 - 4周前后接受了评估。评估包括视觉模拟评分（VAS）、生活质量（QOL）问卷、尿培养以及1小时的尿垫试验。VAS评分显示压力性尿失禁症状有显著改善（P<0.05）。尿失禁影响问卷和泌尿生殖系统困扰量表的QOL评分分别显著提高了38%（P<0.05）和29%（P<0.01）。平均尿垫重量下降了47%（P = 0.056）。在9名未使用该装置时尿垫试验阳性（>2 g）的女性中，有5名使用该装置后尿垫干燥（<2 g）（P<0.05）。这些初步数据表明该装置对GSI女性有效。
