• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

α-β-L-天冬氨酸镁治疗慢性苯二氮䓬类药物滥用:与安慰剂对照的双盲研究

[alpha-beta L-aspartate magnesium in treatment of chronic benzodiazepine abuse: controlled and double-blind study versus placebo].

作者信息

Hantouche E G, Guelfi J D, Comet D

机构信息

Département de Psychiatrie, Groupe Hospitalier de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris.

出版信息

Encephale. 1998 Sep-Oct;24(5):469-79.

PMID:9850822
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of alpha-beta L-Aspartate Magnesium (Asp Mg) in discontinuation of long-term benzodiazepine use and to search for a predictive model of success for BZD cessation.

METHOD

Using a double-blind procedure, 144 patients selected as chronic users of one of 3 BZD lorazepam, alprazolam or bromazepam (duration of use > 6 months; regular dose > or = 3 mg lorazepam equivalent) and with clinical remission (score on Hamilton-Anxiety < 14; Raskin-Depression < 6) had entered a controlled study (versus placebo) and were randomized in two parallel groups. The trial was conducted on 3 consecutive phases (co-administration of Asp Mg or placebo with BZD during 1 month; gradual taper of BZD during 1 month; follow-up during a third month after complete BZD discontinuation, with urinary BZD control on d75 and d90).

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat analysis showed at the endpoint an overall rate of 80% of "BZD discontinuation" and of 35.4% of "BZD cessation without withdrawal" in the total population (no significant intergroup differences were observed on these rates). However, there were some tendencies to positive differences between Asp Mg versus placebo on the following: 1) prolonged delay of BZD use if reintake (30 days vs 20 days, p [log-rank] = 0.5); 2) reduction of withdrawal intensity: 11% of important difficulties during BZD cessation versus 23% with placebo (p = 0.2) and on Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire (BWSQ) (final score 4.0 vs 4.8, p = 0.10); 3) lower modification of anxiety during BZD tapering and discontinuation (rate of increase on HAM-A between d30-d90 of 6% vs 23% in placebo group, p = 0.10). Moreover, 3 predictive factors of "success" (BZD cessation without withdrawal phenomenon) were identified by uni- and multivariate analysis with logistic regression: chronicity of anxiety disorder (p = 0.04) and amplitude of BWSQ change during tapering phase (p < 0.0001) as negative factors; and initial score of Speilberger Anxiety Inventory "Anxiety-Trait" (p = 0.002) as positive factor. A predictive model is constructed according to these 3 parameters. Further clinical trials are needed to explore the benefits of alpha-beta L-Aspartate Magnesium in different criteria of prescription (dosage, duration of treatment, repetitive cures...).

摘要

目的

评估α-β 天门冬氨酸镁(Asp Mg)在停用长期苯二氮䓬类药物方面的疗效,并寻找苯二氮䓬类药物戒断成功的预测模型。

方法

采用双盲程序,144名被选为三种苯二氮䓬类药物(劳拉西泮、阿普唑仑或溴西泮)之一的长期使用者(使用时间>6个月;常规剂量>或 = 3mg劳拉西泮等效剂量)且临床症状缓解(汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分<14;拉斯金抑郁量表评分<6)的患者进入一项对照研究(与安慰剂对照),并随机分为两个平行组。试验分三个连续阶段进行(Asp Mg或安慰剂与苯二氮䓬类药物联合使用1个月;苯二氮䓬类药物逐渐减量1个月;在完全停用苯二氮䓬类药物后的第三个月进行随访,在第75天和第90天检测尿中苯二氮䓬类药物)。

结果

意向性分析显示,在终点时,总体人群中“停用苯二氮䓬类药物”的比例为80%,“无戒断反应停用苯二氮䓬类药物”的比例为35.4%(在这些比例上未观察到组间显著差异)。然而,Asp Mg与安慰剂相比在以下方面存在一些积极差异的趋势:1)如果重新使用苯二氮䓬类药物,使用延迟延长(30天对20天,p[对数秩检验]=0.5);2)戒断强度降低:苯二氮䓬类药物戒断期间出现严重困难的比例为11%,而安慰剂组为23%(p = 0.2),以及在苯二氮䓬类药物戒断症状问卷(BWSQ)上(最终得分4.0对4.8,p = 0.10);3)在苯二氮䓬类药物减量和停药期间焦虑的变化较小(第30天至第90天汉密尔顿焦虑量表增加率为6%,而安慰剂组为23%,p = 0.10)。此外,通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定了“成功”(无戒断现象停用苯二氮䓬类药物)的3个预测因素:焦虑症的慢性程度(p = 0.04)和减量阶段BWSQ变化幅度(p < 0.0001)为负因素;以及斯皮尔伯格焦虑量表“焦虑特质”初始得分(p = 0.002)为正因素。根据这3个参数构建了一个预测模型。需要进一步的临床试验来探索α-β 天门冬氨酸镁在不同处方标准(剂量、治疗持续时间、重复治疗……)下的益处。

相似文献

1
[alpha-beta L-aspartate magnesium in treatment of chronic benzodiazepine abuse: controlled and double-blind study versus placebo].α-β-L-天冬氨酸镁治疗慢性苯二氮䓬类药物滥用:与安慰剂对照的双盲研究
Encephale. 1998 Sep-Oct;24(5):469-79.
2
[Comparison of 6 different methods for lorazepam withdrawal. A controlled study, hydroxyzine versus placebo].[6种不同劳拉西泮撤药方法的比较。一项对照研究,羟嗪与安慰剂对比]
Encephale. 1997 Jul-Aug;23(4):290-9.
3
Intravenous flumazenil versus oxazepam tapering in the treatment of benzodiazepine withdrawal: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.静脉注射氟马西尼与逐渐减量使用奥沙西泮治疗苯二氮䓬类药物戒断反应的随机安慰剂对照研究。
Addict Biol. 2002 Oct;7(4):385-95. doi: 10.1080/1355621021000005973.
4
Deramciclane in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-finding study.德洛环烷治疗广泛性焦虑症:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、剂量探索研究。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Dec;15(6):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 Jun 9.
5
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ipsapirone versus lorazepam in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a prospective multicenter trial.一项比较伊沙匹隆与劳拉西泮治疗广泛性焦虑症患者的疗效和安全性的双盲、安慰剂对照研究:一项前瞻性多中心试验。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Dec;13(6):429-37.
6
[Dependence on benzodiazepines. Clinical and biological aspects].[对苯二氮䓬类药物的依赖。临床与生物学方面]
Encephale. 1994 Mar-Apr;20(2):147-57.
7
The role of captodiamine in the withdrawal from long-term benzodiazepine treatment.卡普托胺在长期苯二氮䓬类药物治疗撤药过程中的作用。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Sep;20(9):1347-55. doi: 10.1185/030079904125004457.
8
Safety of ipsapirone treatment compared with lorazepam: discontinuation effects.与劳拉西泮相比,伊沙匹隆治疗的安全性:撤药效应。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1998 Jan;23(1):35-44.
9
Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescent patients: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.混合安非他明盐缓释剂(阿得拉XR)治疗青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效与安全性:一项为期4周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):266-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.011.
10
Abecarnil for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled comparison of two dosage ranges of abecarnil and buspirone.阿贝卡尼治疗广泛性焦虑症:阿贝卡尼与丁螺环酮两个剂量范围的安慰剂对照比较
J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58 Suppl 11:19-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Metabolic diversity as a reason for unsuccessful detoxification from benzodiazepines: the rationale for serum BZD concentration monitoring.代谢多样性是苯二氮䓬类药物解毒失败的原因:血清 BZD 浓度监测的基本原理。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;77(6):795-808. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03048-y. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
2
Challenges of the pharmacological management of benzodiazepine withdrawal, dependence, and discontinuation.苯二氮䓬类药物戒断、依赖及停药的药物治疗挑战。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;8(5):147-168. doi: 10.1177/2045125317753340. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
3
Pharmacological interventions for benzodiazepine discontinuation in chronic benzodiazepine users.
慢性苯二氮䓬类药物使用者停用苯二氮䓬类药物的药理学干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD011481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011481.pub2.
4
Magnesium for alcohol withdrawal.用于酒精戒断的镁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;2013(6):CD008358. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008358.pub2.