Luke L S, Atchison K A, White S C
UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
Angle Orthod. 1998 Dec;68(6):513-20. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0513:COPCIO>2.3.CO;2.
The purpose of this study was to examine diagnosis and treatment planning categorizations used by experienced orthodontists. Thirty-nine clinicians were asked to evaluate six test cases and formulate a diagnosis and treatment plan for each. The information provided was categorized using a problem-oriented classification. The results indicate little agreement exists in diagnostic subcategories, such as molar relationship, degree of crowding, or the nature of skeletal discrepancies. There was also little agreement regarding some treatment strategies, such as extraction of teeth, the use of orthopedic appliances, or the use of surgery. A need exists for better definitions of diagnostic criteria and appropriate treatment options.
本研究的目的是考察经验丰富的正畸医生所使用的诊断和治疗计划分类。39位临床医生被要求评估6个测试病例,并为每个病例制定诊断和治疗计划。所提供的信息使用面向问题的分类法进行归类。结果表明,在诸如磨牙关系、拥挤程度或骨骼差异的性质等诊断子类别中,几乎没有一致性。在一些治疗策略方面,如拔牙、使用矫形器具或手术的使用,也几乎没有一致性。需要对诊断标准和适当的治疗选择进行更好的定义。