Smulders F J, Greer G G
Institute for Meat Hygiene, Meat Technology and Food Science, Veterinary Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Nov 10;44(3):149-69. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00123-8.
A considerable literature reports the antibacterial efficacy of dilute solutions of organic acids (lactic, acetic). With carcasses an overall reduction in surface contaminants of 1.5 log cycles can be expected. Carcass decontamination may not improve the safety of the resultant meat, but laboratory trials confirm that acid decontamination of subprimal and retail cuts is more efficacious. An advantage over many other intervention strategies is that residual antimicrobial activity is demonstrable over extended periods of storage. These studies have also shown that some meatborne pathogens are particularly sensitive to organic acids (i.e., Yersinia enterocolitica) while others are resistant (i.e., E. coli O157:H7). Dilute solutions of organic acids (1 to 3%) are generally without effect on the desirable sensory properties of meat when used as a carcass decontaminant. However, dependent on treatment conditions, lactic and acetic acid can produce adverse sensory changes when applied directly to meat cuts, with irreversible changes in appearance being a frequent occurrence. It is speculated that organic acid decontamination will be implemented in American abattoirs in an effort to meet specified performance standards for pathogen reduction as part of an overall HACCP program. In contrast, the EU advocates that strictly controlled processing hygiene is sufficient to ensure the safety of the product. Additional research is necessary to establish a set of treatment conditions that may permit a practicable reduction in bacterial contamination throughout the processing chain with a measurable effect on safety and storage life, without imposing any change in sensory properties. It will also be necessary to develop standard, objective measures to assess HACCP and the efficacy of decontamination procedures. Without such commercial studies controversy on the practicality of acid decontamination will persist.
大量文献报道了有机酸(乳酸、乙酸)稀溶液的抗菌功效。对于屠体,预计表面污染物总体减少1.5个对数周期。屠体去污可能不会提高最终肉类的安全性,但实验室试验证实,对分割肉和零售切块进行酸去污更有效。与许多其他干预策略相比,一个优势是在延长的储存期内可证明有残留抗菌活性。这些研究还表明,一些食源性病原体对有机酸特别敏感(即小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌),而其他病原体则具有抗性(即大肠杆菌O157:H7)。当用作屠体去污剂时,有机酸稀溶液(1%至3%)通常不会影响肉类理想的感官特性。然而,取决于处理条件,乳酸和乙酸直接应用于肉块时会产生不良的感官变化,外观上的不可逆变化很常见。据推测,美国的屠宰场将采用有机酸去污措施,以努力达到病原体减少的特定性能标准,作为整个危害分析与关键控制点(HACCP)计划的一部分。相比之下,欧盟主张严格控制加工卫生足以确保产品安全。有必要进行更多研究,以确定一套处理条件,在整个加工链中切实减少细菌污染,对安全性和储存期产生可测量的影响,同时不改变感官特性。还需要制定标准、客观的措施来评估HACCP和去污程序的效果。没有此类商业研究,关于酸去污实用性的争议将持续存在。