Suppr超能文献

斜视性弱视的蓝光滤过弱视治疗方案:50例前瞻性对照研究

Blue filter amblyopia treatment protocol for strabismic amblyopia: a prospective comparative study of 50 cases.

作者信息

Metzler U, Ham O, Flores V, Claramunt M, Sepulveda C, Casanova D

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, University of Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile.

出版信息

Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 1998;13(4):241-8.

PMID:9852438
Abstract

PURPOSE

Previous studies of monochromatic visual evoked potentials confirm the strong suppression of (the cortical representation of) paracentral retinal areas of functionally amblyopic eyes, by a flat response to a blue stimulus. A clinical trial stimulating these areas with blue light was encouraging, and justified a prospective comparison of this treatment with conventional classic treatment.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In 50 strabismic children with amblyopia, the blue filter treatment protocol (flash stimulation with, and the wearing of, a blue filter during occlusion of the better eye for one hour daily) was compared with the classical treatment (full time total occlusion by patch) in a prospective matched and randomized study. Patients 3 to 7 years old without previous treatment and a visual acuity up to 0.3 were admitted to the study. Visual acuity and fixation behavior were used as the parameters of comparison. Visual Evoked Potentials by monochromatic flashes were also studied. Results of treatment were compared after 6 months.

RESULTS

The visual acuity outcome for the blue filter treatment was "statistically significantly" better (p=0.005). The greatest improvement was seen in the subgroup of children with eccentric fixation (p=0.01). Fixation behavior also showed a better outcome from the blue filter treatment (p=0.05) favoring especially children between 3 and 5 years. In children of this age with a visual acuity better than 0.1 we found a very "statistically significant" difference between the two treatments (p=0.004). In children 3 to 5 years old with poorer visual acuity we also found a "statistically significant" difference in the two treatments (p=0.04). The interocular difference of amplitude on the Visual Evoked Potentials also demonstrated more improvement in children treated with the blue filter. This treatment improved especially the cortical response to blue flash stimulation, correlating to paracentral retinal areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The blue filter treatment protocol provided better results for treating amblyopia than the conventional classic occlusion treatment method. We propose that stimulation of these paracentral retinal areas triggers a better disinhibition of a functionally amblyopic eye.

摘要

目的

以往关于单色视觉诱发电位的研究证实,功能性弱视眼的旁中心视网膜区域(的皮质代表区)受到强烈抑制,对蓝色刺激呈现平坦反应。一项用蓝光刺激这些区域的临床试验结果令人鼓舞,因此有理由对这种治疗方法与传统经典治疗方法进行前瞻性比较。

受试者与方法

在一项前瞻性配对随机研究中,将50例斜视性弱视儿童的蓝光滤片治疗方案(每天用蓝光滤片进行闪光刺激,并在遮盖优势眼1小时期间佩戴蓝光滤片)与经典治疗方法(用眼罩全天完全遮盖)进行比较。纳入研究的患者年龄在3至7岁之间,此前未接受过治疗,视力最高为0.3。将视力和注视行为作为比较参数。还研究了单色闪光诱发的视觉诱发电位。6个月后比较治疗结果。

结果

蓝光滤片治疗的视力结果“在统计学上有显著改善”(p = 0.005)。在偏心注视儿童亚组中改善最为明显(p = 0.01)。注视行为在蓝光滤片治疗后也有更好的结果(p = 0.05),尤其有利于3至5岁的儿童。在这个年龄段且视力优于0.1的儿童中,我们发现两种治疗方法之间存在非常“显著的统计学差异”(p = 0.004)。在3至5岁且视力较差的儿童中,我们也发现两种治疗方法存在“显著的统计学差异”(p = 0.04)。视觉诱发电位的眼间振幅差异在接受蓝光滤片治疗的儿童中也显示出更大的改善。这种治疗尤其改善了皮质对蓝色闪光刺激的反应,这与旁中心视网膜区域相关。

结论

蓝光滤片治疗方案在治疗弱视方面比传统经典遮盖治疗方法效果更好。我们认为,刺激这些旁中心视网膜区域能更好地解除功能性弱视眼的抑制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验