Beveridge I, Gregory G G
Aust Vet J. 1976 Aug;52(8):369-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1976.tb09491.x.
An investigation into the reliability of various morphological criteria in differentiating species of Taenia in Australia showed that both the anatomy of the mature proglottis and the gross morphology of the worms were reliable methods if suitably relaxed anf fixed specimens were available. Measurements of rostellar hoods were useful but did not provide unequivocal identification due to overlap in sizes; urine branch numbers were found to be of little use.
一项关于澳大利亚绦虫物种鉴别中各种形态学标准可靠性的调查表明,如果有适当松弛和固定的标本,成熟节片的解剖结构和虫体的总体形态都是可靠的鉴别方法。头节小钩的测量是有用的,但由于大小存在重叠,不能提供明确的鉴别;发现侧枝数量没什么用。