Schulenburg J, Bergann T
Institut für Lebensmittelhygiene, Fachbereich Veterinarmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin, Deutschland.
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1998 Nov;45(9):551-9.
The impedance technique mostly meets today's requirements of microbiological rapid methods. At relatively high prime cost for the equipment the advantages are marked by low personnel and material costs as well as swiftness combined with highly flexible usage. The method is applicable for both quantitative and qualitative examinations but can fail occasionally in total count determination, especially if the sample material contains heterogeneous microbes. In model investigations with 53 strains of 17 different genera Enterobacteriaceae strains, Aeromonads and Enterococcus strains proved to be highly impedance effective. Lactobacillus strains and Pseudomonads as well as Staphylococcus aureus strains showed a low impedance effectiveness. Several strains, for example of the genera Micrococcus, Acinetobacter and Brochothrix, did not show any changes of the medium impedance under the chosen conditions. Criterion for characterization of impedance effectiveness was the impedance detection time starting with identical initial counts (10(3) cfu/ml). Impedance effectiveness of microbes was determined at highly varying degree by the parameters of generation time, lag-phase duration and relative activity. This can lead either to wrong negative (underestimations) or wrong positive (overestimations) results of bacterial count.
阻抗技术基本满足了当今微生物快速检测方法的要求。尽管设备的初始成本相对较高,但其优势在于人力和材料成本低,检测速度快,且使用高度灵活。该方法适用于定量和定性检测,但在总数测定中偶尔可能会失败,尤其是当样品材料含有异质微生物时。在对17个不同属的53株肠杆菌科菌株、气单胞菌和肠球菌菌株进行的模型研究中,结果表明这些菌株具有很高的阻抗效应。乳酸杆菌菌株、假单胞菌以及金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的阻抗效应较低。在所选条件下,几株菌,如微球菌属、不动杆菌属和热杀索丝菌属的菌株,其培养基阻抗没有任何变化。阻抗效应的表征标准是以相同的初始菌数(10³ cfu/ml)开始的阻抗检测时间。微生物的阻抗效应在很大程度上由代时、延迟期持续时间和相对活性等参数决定。这可能导致细菌计数出现错误的阴性(低估)或错误的阳性(高估)结果。