• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物假体和机械假体患者的生活质量。对植入时年龄在51至65岁的患者队列进行评估。

Quality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51 to 65 years at implantation.

作者信息

Perchinsky M, Henderson C, Jamieson W R, Anderson W N, Lamy A, Lowe N, de Guzman S

机构信息

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II81-6; discussion II86-7.

PMID:9852886
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was 3-fold: to compare the quality of life (QOL) in age- and sex-matched patients who received biological and mechanical prosthetic valves in isolated aortic valve replacement, to compare the QOL of patients with aortic valve replacement with the general population, and to compare patients with biological and mechanical prostheses with certain valve-specific questions and relate these responses to overall QOL.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patient-perceived QOL was evaluated in 200 patients who were sampled from a population of 420 patients (age range 51 to 65 years) who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement in the period of 1986 to 1996. One hundred of the sampled patients had a mechanical valve inserted and an equal number had porcine bioprostheses. Three survey instruments were used to examine perceived QOL: the SF-12 form, a 7-valve specific question form, and the Lamy Smiley Faces form. The response to the questionnaires was 89.5% (179 patients). Patients with mechanical valves were more bothered by valve sounds (P < 0.01) and had a negative correlation (P < 0.01) between valve sound and QOL on the mental scale only. Patients with biological valves were more fearful of the need for reoperation (P < 0.01), but there was no correlation between fear and QOL. The mechanical valve group had a negative correlation (P < 0.01) between fear of reoperation and QOL on both the mental and physical scales. There was no difference between the 2 cohorts with respect to fear of valve failure. Patients with mechanical valves were more concerned about frequency of medical visits and blood tests (P < 0.01) as well as the possibility of anticoagulant-related bleeding events (P < 0.01). QOL was equivalent between the 2 groups and to the general population for the same age group. Ninety-seven percent of the patients indicated they would make the same surgical decision again with regard to valve replacement; there was no difference between the 2 valve groups on this question.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-perceived QOL is similar between patients with aortic mechanical and biological valve replacement in the studied age group and comparable to the general population of similar age. Although certain valve-specific differences exist between the 2 prosthetic types, these differences do not appear to affect overall QOL as described by these patients.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的有三个:比较在单纯主动脉瓣置换术中接受生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜的年龄及性别匹配患者的生活质量(QOL);比较主动脉瓣置换患者与普通人群的生活质量;比较生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜患者对某些瓣膜特定问题的回答,并将这些回答与总体生活质量相关联。

方法与结果

从1986年至1996年期间接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术的420名患者(年龄范围51至65岁)中抽取200名患者,评估其自我感知的生活质量。抽取的患者中,100名植入了机械瓣膜,另外100名植入了猪生物瓣膜。使用三种调查工具来检查自我感知的生活质量:SF - 12表格、一份包含7个瓣膜特定问题的表格以及拉米笑脸表格。问卷回复率为89.5%(179名患者)。机械瓣膜患者更容易受到瓣膜声音的困扰(P < 0.01),并且仅在心理量表上,瓣膜声音与生活质量呈负相关(P < 0.01)。生物瓣膜患者更担心再次手术的必要性(P < 0.01),但担心程度与生活质量之间无相关性。机械瓣膜组在心理和生理量表上,对再次手术的恐惧与生活质量均呈负相关(P < 0.01)。两组患者在对瓣膜故障的恐惧方面无差异。机械瓣膜患者更担心就诊频率和血液检查(P < 0.01)以及抗凝相关出血事件的可能性(P < 0.01)。两组患者的生活质量相当,且与同年龄组的普通人群相当。97%的患者表示就瓣膜置换而言,他们会再次做出相同的手术决定;在这个问题上,两组瓣膜患者之间没有差异。

结论

在研究的年龄组中,接受主动脉机械瓣膜和生物瓣膜置换的患者自我感知的生活质量相似,且与相似年龄的普通人群相当。尽管两种假体类型之间存在某些瓣膜特定的差异,但这些差异似乎并未影响这些患者所描述的总体生活质量。

相似文献

1
Quality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51 to 65 years at implantation.生物假体和机械假体患者的生活质量。对植入时年龄在51至65岁的患者队列进行评估。
Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II81-6; discussion II86-7.
2
Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.50至70岁患者的主动脉瓣置换术:机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜相比,预后改善
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Apr;135(4):878-84; discussion 884. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.065. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
3
[Quality of life after homograft aortic valve replacement and reoperation].[同种异体主动脉瓣置换及再次手术后的生活质量]
Przegl Lek. 2004;61(6):631-5.
4
[The long term (15 years) evolution after valvular replacement with mechanical prosthesis or bioprosthesis between the age of 60 and 70 years].[60至70岁之间接受机械瓣膜或生物瓣膜置换术后的长期(15年)演变情况]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2004 Jan;97(1):7-14.
5
Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses.主动脉瓣置换术:机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜的选择
J Card Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):299-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00580.x. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
6
The influence of coronary artery disease on quality of life after mechanical valve replacement.冠状动脉疾病对机械瓣膜置换术后生活质量的影响。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Mar;13(2):260-71.
7
Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.人工心脏瓣膜置换术后再次手术的晚期发生率及影响因素
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Mar;25(3):364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2003.12.013.
8
Is the St. Jude Medical mechanical valve an appropriate choice for elderly patients?: A long-term retrospective study measuring quality of life.圣犹达医疗机械瓣膜对老年患者来说是合适的选择吗?:一项衡量生活质量的长期回顾性研究。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Jan;15(1):57-66; discussion 66.
9
Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.使用微观模拟比较机械瓣膜或生物瓣膜置换主动脉瓣后的结局。
Heart. 2004 Oct;90(10):1172-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.013102.
10
Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.主动脉瓣置换术:55至70岁患者机械瓣膜与生物瓣膜的前瞻性随机评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 10;54(20):1862-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring what matters to the patient: health related quality of life after aortic valve and thoracic aortic surgery.衡量对患者重要的事项:主动脉瓣和胸主动脉手术后与健康相关的生活质量。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0830-9. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
2
Quality of life after aortic valve repair is similar to Ross patients and superior to mechanical valve replacement: a cross-sectional study.主动脉瓣修复术后的生活质量与Ross手术患者相似,且优于机械瓣膜置换术:一项横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Apr 2;16:63. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0236-0.
3
Quality of life and prosthetic aortic valve selection in non-elderly adult patients.
非老年成年患者的生活质量与人工主动脉瓣选择
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;22(6):723-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw021. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
4
Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.主动脉瓣疾病的外科治疗。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Jul;10(7):375-86. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.72. Epub 2013 May 14.
5
Quality of life before and after heart valve surgery is influenced by gender and type of valve.心脏瓣膜手术前后的生活质量受性别和瓣膜类型的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2005 Apr;14(3):769-78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-1667-0.
6
Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.老年人主动脉瓣置换术后的中期结局及生活质量:机械瓣膜与无支架生物瓣膜的比较
Heart. 2005 Aug;91(8):1023-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.036178.