McCombs J S, Liu G, Shi J, Feng W, Cody M, Parker J P, Nichol M B, Hay J W, Johnson K A, Groshen S L, Nye M T
Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998 Dec 1;55(23):2485-99. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/55.23.2485.
The impacts of three alternative models of pharmacist consultation on the use and cost of health care services were studied. Two studies were conducted concurrently in an HMO over two years. In one, 6000 patients were randomly assigned to one of three consultation models; in the other, the three models were implemented in six geographic regions of California (4600 patients). The models were (1) consultation about new or changed prescriptions as mandated by state law (state model), (2) consultation focused on selected high-risk ambulatory care patients (Kaiser Permanente [KP] model), and (3) a control model. The patients were surveyed three times about their health status and satisfaction, and computerized data on health care use and cost were collected. The effect of the consultation models on the use and cost of health care services was examined across five risk groups that were based on drug-use profiles. An additional 37,750 patients (10% of the patients residing in the areawide study sites) were included in a supplemental analysis of the use and cost of health care services. There was no indication in the random-assignment study that pharmacist consultations affected either drug costs or the cost of office visits. Similar results were found in the areawide study, with the exception that the KP model was associated with lower drug costs than the control model. In the 10% sample, the KP model appeared to be associated with lower office visit costs but higher drug costs. Both models were associated with a lower likelihood of a hospital admission and with lower total health care costs for some high-risk patients compared with the control model. Counseling patients about their medications may be unlikely to reduce medication costs or the cost of office visits but may reduce the likelihood of hospital admissions and the overall costs of health care services; a combination of counseling patients at high risk for drug-related problems and counseling all patients about any new or changed prescription should be considered.
研究了三种替代的药剂师咨询模式对医疗服务使用和成本的影响。在一家健康维护组织(HMO)中同时进行了两项为期两年的研究。在一项研究中,6000名患者被随机分配到三种咨询模式中的一种;在另一项研究中,这三种模式在加利福尼亚州的六个地理区域实施(4600名患者)。这些模式分别是:(1)按照州法律要求对新处方或更改后的处方进行咨询(州模式),(2)针对选定的高危门诊患者进行咨询(凯撒医疗集团[KP]模式),以及(3)一个对照模式。对患者进行了三次关于健康状况和满意度的调查,并收集了有关医疗服务使用和成本的计算机化数据。基于用药情况,在五个风险组中研究了咨询模式对医疗服务使用和成本的影响。另外37750名患者(占整个研究区域居住患者的10%)被纳入医疗服务使用和成本的补充分析。在随机分配研究中,没有迹象表明药剂师咨询会影响药品成本或门诊费用。在整个区域的研究中也发现了类似结果,唯一的例外是KP模式与对照模式相比,药品成本较低。在10%的样本中,KP模式似乎与较低的门诊费用相关,但药品成本较高。与对照模式相比,这两种模式都与较低的住院可能性以及某些高危患者较低的总体医疗成本相关。就患者的用药情况进行咨询可能不太可能降低药品成本或门诊费用,但可能会降低住院可能性和医疗服务的总体成本;应考虑将对有药物相关问题高风险的患者进行咨询与对所有患者就任何新处方或更改后的处方进行咨询相结合。