Iwaki E, Saito T, Tsuda G, Sugimoto C, Kimura Y, Takahashi N, Fujita K, Sunaga H, Saito H
Department of Otolaryngology, Fukui Medical School, Japan.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 1998 Dec;25(4):361-8. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(98)00022-4.
The medical records of 220 ears of 137 pediatric patients (85 male and 52 female) in which three kinds of ventilation tubes were inserted for treating otitis media with effusion (OME) were reviewed. The tubes selected were the Shepard grommet (75 ears), Goode-T (39 ears), and Paparella type II tube (106 ears). The criteria for tube placement were as follows: (1) continuous conductive hearing loss with over 25 dB air-bone gap, (2) resistance to conservative therapy for over 6 months, and (3) retracted and glue-colored tympanic membrane with type B tympanogram. The tubes that remained in place for over 18-24 months were removed intentionally in combination with a freshening of the perforation edge and tape-patch technique using Steri-Strip tape (3M) for preventing permanent eardrum perforation, because the incidence of persistent perforation became higher after long-term intubation. Shepard grommets tended to be extruded earlier, while Paparella type II tubes tended to stay longer. The OME recurrence rate decreased 12 months or more after tubal insertion. There was a tendency for the recurrence rate to decrease the longer the tube stayed in the eardrum. The number of recurrences decreased when the patient's age at the tube removal or extrusion was 7-8 years old. Adenoidectomy did not influence the recurrence rate of OME. Although the Goode-T and Paparella tube II tubes showed high perforation rates, the perforation rate after extrusion or removal of the tube was decreased by the use of the tape patch technique in combination with a freshening of the perforation edge. From these findings, it was concluded that the appropriate intubation period for the treatment of OME in children is over 12 months with the use of a long-term tube, and that if the patient's age at the time of tube insertion was below 6 years, it might be better that the removal of the tube is postponed until the patient is 8 years of age.
回顾了137例儿科患者(85例男性和52例女性)220耳的病历,这些耳朵插入了三种通气管以治疗分泌性中耳炎(OME)。所选的通气管为谢泼德通气管(75耳)、古德-T通气管(39耳)和帕帕雷拉II型通气管(106耳)。通气管置入标准如下:(1)持续传导性听力损失,气骨导差超过25dB;(2)保守治疗6个月以上无效;(3)鼓膜内陷且呈胶样色泽,鼓室图为B型。对于留置超过18 - 24个月的通气管,为防止永久性鼓膜穿孔,会结合使用3M公司的思乐扣胶带对穿孔边缘进行清创和贴补技术,有意将其取出,因为长期置管后持续性穿孔的发生率会升高。谢泼德通气管往往较早脱出,而帕帕雷拉II型通气管往往留置时间更长。通气管插入12个月或更长时间后,OME复发率降低。通气管在鼓膜内留置时间越长,复发率有降低的趋势。当通气管取出或脱出时患者年龄为7 - 8岁时,复发次数减少。腺样体切除术不影响OME的复发率。尽管古德-T通气管和帕帕雷拉II型通气管显示出较高的穿孔率,但通过结合使用胶带贴补技术和对穿孔边缘进行清创,通气管脱出或取出后的穿孔率降低。从这些发现得出结论,儿童OME治疗的合适置管期为使用长期通气管超过12个月,并且如果置管时患者年龄低于6岁,可能最好将通气管取出推迟到患者8岁。