Horne G, Jamaludin A, Critchlow J D, Falconer D A, Newman M C, Oghoetuoma J, Pease E H, Lieberman B A
Department of Reproductive Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3045-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3045.
Insemination with donor spermatozoa is an integral part of infertility treatment. For the last 3 years in our unit, intrauterine insemination with donor spermatozoa (IUID) has been used in preference to vaginal insemination. In this retrospective study, patients were offered an initial course of five single intrauterine inseminations with cryopreserved donor spermatozoa and treatment was then reviewed. A total of 389 patients received 1465 inseminations. In all, 1119 cycles were monitored using luteinizing hormone serum analyses and 346 cycles using the urine home test kits. The clinical pregnancy rate per insemination for the cycles monitored by the serum assay was 18.0% (202/1119) compared with the urine cycles (13.7%, 46/346) (P <05). The pregnancy loss rate was not significantly different (14.4%, 29/202 and 21.7%, 10/46) (serum and urine cycles respectively). The viable clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P <03) for the serum cycles than for the cycles using the urinary monitoring (15.5%, 173/1119 and 10.4%, 36/346 respectively). The cycles monitored by serum assay had a significantly higher cumulative viable clinical pregnancy rate (P <0001) of 70.2% after nine inseminations compared with the urine monitored cycles of 54.8%. The majority of patients opted for the serum cycles, with a minority self-selecting the urine cycles mainly for travelling convenience. The explanation for the significant differences between the viable clinical pregnancy rates per insemination and the cumulative viable clinical pregnancy rates may be due to the sensitivity of the urine home test kit or the patients' interpretation of the result.
使用供体精子进行授精是不孕症治疗的一个重要组成部分。在我们单位过去3年里,优先采用了使用供体精子的宫腔内授精(IUID)而非阴道授精。在这项回顾性研究中,为患者提供了一个初始疗程,即使用冷冻保存的供体精子进行5次单次宫腔内授精,然后对治疗情况进行评估。共有389名患者接受了1465次授精。总共1119个周期通过血清促黄体生成素分析进行监测,346个周期使用家用尿液检测试剂盒进行监测。血清检测监测的周期每次授精的临床妊娠率为18.0%(202/1119),而尿液检测周期为13.7%(46/346)(P<0.05)。妊娠丢失率无显著差异(分别为14.4%,29/202和21.7%,10/46)(血清和尿液检测周期)。血清检测周期的存活临床妊娠率显著高于使用尿液监测的周期(P<0.03)(分别为15.5%,173/1119和10.4%,36/346)。血清检测监测的周期在9次授精后的累积存活临床妊娠率显著更高(P<0.0001),为70.2%,而尿液监测周期为54.8%。大多数患者选择血清检测周期,少数患者主要出于出行方便自行选择尿液检测周期。每次授精的存活临床妊娠率和累积存活临床妊娠率之间存在显著差异的原因可能是家用尿液检测试剂盒的敏感性或患者对检测结果的解读。