Federman C A, Dumesic D A, Boone W R, Shapiro S S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53792.
Fertil Steril. 1990 Sep;54(3):489-92. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53767-4.
A prospective randomized study was performed to evaluate the use of a urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) detection kit with 1 insemination as compared with 2 alternate day inseminations with timing based on previous cycle length and basal body temperature changes. The study involved 60 patients who underwent a total of 264 therapeutic donor insemination cycles using cryopreserved semen specimens. Patients alternated LH-kit timed cycles with cycles timed by non-LH methods for a total of 6 cycles or until pregnancy was achieved. Fecundability rates were 12.3% for LH-kit cycles and 5.3% for non-LH method cycles. The difference in outcome was not statistically significant. However, when the LH kit plus 1 insemination was compared with 2 inseminations timed by conventional methods, there appeared to be a distinct monetary and time expenditure advantage. These findings suggest that sufficient advantage may be derived from use of an LH kit to recommend its use on a routine basis for the timing of therapeutic donor insemination.
开展了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估使用尿促黄体生成素(LH)检测试剂盒并进行1次授精与根据既往周期长度和基础体温变化进行隔日2次授精的效果。该研究纳入60例患者,他们使用冷冻精液标本共进行了264个治疗性供体授精周期。患者将基于LH试剂盒计时的周期与非LH方法计时的周期交替进行,共6个周期,或直至怀孕。LH试剂盒周期的受孕率为12.3%,非LH方法周期的受孕率为5.3%。结果差异无统计学意义。然而,当将LH试剂盒加1次授精与传统方法计时的2次授精相比较时,似乎存在明显的金钱和时间支出优势。这些发现表明,使用LH试剂盒可能具有足够的优势,建议在治疗性供体授精的时间安排中常规使用。