• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion.

作者信息

El Sadek M M, Amer M K, Abdel-Malak G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University, Egypt.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3053-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3053.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/13.11.3053
PMID:9853855
Abstract

The aim of this work was to compare the efficiency of standard intrauterine insemination (IUI) and Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) in the treatment of infertility. Ninety-six consecutive patients with infertility in 100 cycles were included in the study. Those randomized to standard IUI included 48 patients in 50 cycles [25 clomiphene citrate only and 25 clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) cycles] (group I). Patients subjected to FSP included 48 patients in 50 cycles (18 clomiphene citrate only and 32 clomiphene citrate/HMG cycles) (group II). The overall pregnancy rate per cycle (16% versus 18%) was not significantly different in the two groups. The pregnancy rates were also similar in the two groups when compared for the cause of infertility: ovulatory disorder 16.7% versus 16%, tubal impairment 10% versus 9.1%, cervical hostility (no pregnancy occurred in this group) and unexplained infertility 21.4 % versus 25 %. The overall pregnancy rate (for the two groups) appeared higher when clomiphene citrate/HMG was used for ovulation induction (21.1%) than when clomiphene citrate only was used (11.6%).

摘要

相似文献

1
Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion.
Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3053-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3053.
2
Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量人绝经期促性腺激素与枸橼酸氯米酚在宫腔内人工授精治疗不孕夫妇中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1079-88. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev062. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
3
A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination.一种新的输卵管精子灌注系统使妊娠率达到标准宫内授精的两倍。
Fertil Steril. 1995 Sep;64(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57784-x.
4
The pregnancy rates with intrauterine insemination (IUI) in superovulated cycles employing different protocols (clomiphen citrate (CC), human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and HMG+CC) and in natural ovulatory cycle.在采用不同方案(枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)、人绝经期促性腺激素(HMG)以及HMG+CC)的超排卵周期和自然排卵周期中,经宫腔内人工授精(IUI)后的妊娠率。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2004 Oct;54(10):503-5.
5
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.非输卵管性不孕症中宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较
Med J Armed Forces India. 2012 Jul;68(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 May 12.
6
Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility.
Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):939-42. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81411-2.
7
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub2.
8
A randomized controlled trial of fallopian tube sperm perfusion compared with standard intrauterine insemination for women with non-tubal infertility.随机对照试验比较输卵管内精子灌注与标准宫腔内人工授精治疗非输卵管性不孕妇女的效果。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2134-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det108. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
9
Superovulation and intrauterine insemination vs. superovulation alone in the treatment of unexplained infertility. A randomized study.超排卵联合宫腔内人工授精与单纯超排卵治疗不明原因不孕症的随机研究
J Reprod Med. 1996 Aug;41(8):614-8.
10
A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and fallopian sperm perfusion for the treatment of infertility.
Fertil Steril. 1995 Sep;64(3):638-40. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57805-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.非输卵管性不孕症中宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较
Med J Armed Forces India. 2012 Jul;68(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 May 12.
2
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;2013(10):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub4.
3
Oral versus injectable ovulation induction agents for unexplained subfertility.
口服与注射用排卵诱导剂治疗不明原因的亚生育力
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003052.