• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility.

作者信息

Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tuomivaara L, Juntunen K, Tomás C, Martikainen H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oulu University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):939-42. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81411-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81411-2
PMID:9130904
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of fallopian tube sperm perfusion utilizing a Foley catheter technique with standard IUI.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled study.

SETTING

The infertility units of the University Central Hospital and the Family Federation of Finland, Oulu, Finland.

PATIENT(S): One hundred infertile women with unexplained factor, minimal to mild endometriosis, mild male factor, or ovarian dysfunction, undergoing 50 IUI and 50 fallopian tube sperm perfusion cycles stimulated by clomiphene citrate and hMG.

INTERVENTION(S): Thirty-six hours after hCG administration, patients were randomized to either the IUI group (group 1, 50 patients and cycles) or the fallopian tube sperm perfusion group (group 2, 50 patients and cycles). Intrauterine insemination was performed using a standard method and fallopian tube sperm perfusion with a pediatric Foley catheter, which prevents the reflux of sperm suspension.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of clinical pregnancies.

RESULTS(S): The fallopian tube sperm perfusion method using a Foley catheter technique was easy to perform and convenient for the patients. The overall pregnancy rate per cycle was 8% for fallopian tube sperm perfusion and 20% for IUI, a difference that was not significant.

CONCLUSION(S): The fallopian tube sperm perfusion method using a Foley catheter offers no advantage in comparison with the conventional IUI technique.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility.
Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):939-42. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81411-2.
2
A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination.一种新的输卵管精子灌注系统使妊娠率达到标准宫内授精的两倍。
Fertil Steril. 1995 Sep;64(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57784-x.
3
A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility.
Fertil Steril. 2001 Dec;76(6):1242-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02913-2.
4
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub2.
5
A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and fallopian sperm perfusion for the treatment of infertility.
Fertil Steril. 1995 Sep;64(3):638-40. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57805-4.
6
Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量人绝经期促性腺激素与枸橼酸氯米酚在宫腔内人工授精治疗不孕夫妇中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1079-88. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev062. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
The value of fallopian tube sperm perfusion in the management of mild-moderate male factor infertility.输卵管精子灌注在处理轻度-中度男性因素不育中的价值。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 May;117(2):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.11.023. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
8
Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial.不明原因不孕症中输卵管精子灌注与宫内人工授精的比较:一项随机、前瞻性、交叉试验。
Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.015.
9
Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion.
Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3053-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3053.
10
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.非输卵管性不孕症中宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较
Med J Armed Forces India. 2012 Jul;68(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical success of IUI cycles with donor sperm is not affected by total inseminated volume: a RCT.供精宫腔内人工授精周期的临床成功率不受总授精体积的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Feb 15;2018(2):hoy002. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoy002. eCollection 2018.
2
The comparison between Intrauterine Insemination and Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion Using FAST®System in Patients with Unexplained Infertility.使用FAST®系统对不明原因不孕症患者进行宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan-Mar;8(4):379-84. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4177. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
3
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.
非输卵管性不孕症中宫腔内人工授精与输卵管内精子灌注的比较
Med J Armed Forces India. 2012 Jul;68(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 May 12.
4
Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.宫腔内人工授精与输卵管精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;2013(10):CD001502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001502.pub4.
5
Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion in Treatment of Nontubal Subfertility: Is It Crucial Step prior to ART?输卵管内精子灌注治疗非输卵管性不孕症:它是辅助生殖技术之前的关键步骤吗?
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:160467. doi: 10.5402/2011/160467. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
6
Oral versus injectable ovulation induction agents for unexplained subfertility.口服与注射用排卵诱导剂治疗不明原因的亚生育力
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003052.