MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 Dec 4;47(47):1017-9.
In January 1997, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended adoption of a sequential inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV)-oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) vaccination schedule. The schedule of injections of IPV at 2 months and 4 months of age, followed by OPV at 12-18 months and again at 4-6 years was intended to minimize the risk for vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) while maintaining population immunity to the potential introduction of wild-type poliovirus. To determine whether this change may result in reduced or delayed vaccination coverage because parents or physicians might be reluctant to administer multiple injections at a single visit, CDC investigated the impact of the change to a sequential IPV-OPV vaccination schedule at two large West coast health maintenance organizations (HMOs). This report summarizes the results of the investigation and indicates that changing to an initial two doses of IPV was not associated with decreases in vaccination coverage levels of routinely recommended vaccinations.
1997年1月,免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)建议采用序贯灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(IPV)-口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(OPV)的接种程序。即2月龄和4月龄时接种IPV,随后在12 - 18月龄和4 - 6岁时接种OPV,该程序旨在将疫苗相关麻痹型脊髓灰质炎(VAPP)的风险降至最低,同时维持人群对野生型脊髓灰质炎病毒潜在传入的免疫力。为了确定这一变化是否会因家长或医生可能不愿在一次就诊时进行多次注射而导致疫苗接种覆盖率降低或延迟,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)在西海岸的两家大型健康维护组织(HMO)中调查了改为序贯IPV - OPV接种程序的影响。本报告总结了调查结果,并表明改为最初两剂IPV与常规推荐疫苗接种覆盖率的降低无关。