Berridge K C, Robinson T E
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109,
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998 Dec;28(3):309-69. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8.
What roles do mesolimbic and neostriatal dopamine systems play in reward? Do they mediate the hedonic impact of rewarding stimuli? Do they mediate hedonic reward learning and associative prediction? Our review of the literature, together with results of a new study of residual reward capacity after dopamine depletion, indicates the answer to both questions is 'no'. Rather, dopamine systems may mediate the incentive salience of rewards, modulating their motivational value in a manner separable from hedonia and reward learning. In a study of the consequences of dopamine loss, rats were depleted of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and neostriatum by up to 99% using 6-hydroxydopamine. In a series of experiments, we applied the 'taste reactivity' measure of affective reactions (gapes, etc.) to assess the capacity of dopamine-depleted rats for: 1) normal affect (hedonic and aversive reactions), 2) modulation of hedonic affect by associative learning (taste aversion conditioning), and 3) hedonic enhancement of affect by non-dopaminergic pharmacological manipulation of palatability (benzodiazepine administration). We found normal hedonic reaction patterns to sucrose vs. quinine, normal learning of new hedonic stimulus values (a change in palatability based on predictive relations), and normal pharmacological hedonic enhancement of palatability. We discuss these results in the context of hypotheses and data concerning the role of dopamine in reward. We review neurochemical, electrophysiological, and other behavioral evidence. We conclude that dopamine systems are not needed either to mediate the hedonic pleasure of reinforcers or to mediate predictive associations involved in hedonic reward learning. We conclude instead that dopamine may be more important to incentive salience attributions to the neural representations of reward-related stimuli. Incentive salience, we suggest, is a distinct component of motivation and reward. In other words, dopamine systems are necessary for 'wanting' incentives, but not for 'liking' them or for learning new 'likes' and 'dislikes'.
中脑边缘多巴胺系统和新纹状体多巴胺系统在奖赏中起什么作用?它们介导奖赏性刺激的享乐影响吗?它们介导享乐性奖赏学习和联想预测吗?我们对文献的综述,以及一项关于多巴胺耗竭后残余奖赏能力的新研究结果表明,这两个问题的答案都是“否”。相反,多巴胺系统可能介导奖赏的动机显著性,以一种与享乐和奖赏学习相分离的方式调节它们的动机价值。在一项关于多巴胺缺失后果的研究中,使用6-羟基多巴胺使大鼠伏隔核和新纹状体中的多巴胺耗竭高达99%。在一系列实验中,我们应用情感反应的“味觉反应性”测量方法(张口等)来评估多巴胺耗竭大鼠在以下方面的能力:1)正常情感(享乐和厌恶反应),2)通过联想学习调节享乐情感(味觉厌恶条件反射),以及3)通过对适口性进行非多巴胺能药理学操纵(给予苯二氮䓬)来增强情感的享乐性。我们发现对蔗糖与奎宁的正常享乐反应模式、对新享乐刺激值的正常学习(基于预测关系的适口性变化)以及对适口性的正常药理学享乐增强。我们在关于多巴胺在奖赏中作用的假设和数据背景下讨论这些结果。我们综述神经化学、电生理和其他行为证据。我们得出结论,多巴胺系统对于介导强化物的享乐愉悦或介导享乐性奖赏学习中涉及的预测性联想并非必需。相反,我们得出结论,多巴胺对于将动机显著性归因于奖赏相关刺激的神经表征可能更为重要。我们认为,动机显著性是动机和奖赏的一个独特组成部分。换句话说,多巴胺系统对于“想要”激励物是必要的,但对于“喜欢”它们或学习新的“喜欢”和“不喜欢”则不是必需的。