Suppr超能文献

关于多巴胺在奖赏中作用的争论:动机显著性的实例

The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

作者信息

Berridge Kent C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street (East Hall), Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):391-431. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Debate continues over the precise causal contribution made by mesolimbic dopamine systems to reward. There are three competing explanatory categories: 'liking', learning, and 'wanting'. Does dopamine mostly mediate the hedonic impact of reward ('liking')? Does it instead mediate learned predictions of future reward, prediction error teaching signals and stamp in associative links (learning)? Or does dopamine motivate the pursuit of rewards by attributing incentive salience to reward-related stimuli ('wanting')? Each hypothesis is evaluated here, and it is suggested that the incentive salience or 'wanting' hypothesis of dopamine function may be consistent with more evidence than either learning or 'liking'. In brief, recent evidence indicates that dopamine is neither necessary nor sufficient to mediate changes in hedonic 'liking' for sensory pleasures. Other recent evidence indicates that dopamine is not needed for new learning, and not sufficient to directly mediate learning by causing teaching or prediction signals. By contrast, growing evidence indicates that dopamine does contribute causally to incentive salience. Dopamine appears necessary for normal 'wanting', and dopamine activation can be sufficient to enhance cue-triggered incentive salience. Drugs of abuse that promote dopamine signals short circuit and sensitize dynamic mesolimbic mechanisms that evolved to attribute incentive salience to rewards. Such drugs interact with incentive salience integrations of Pavlovian associative information with physiological state signals. That interaction sets the stage to cause compulsive 'wanting' in addiction, but also provides opportunities for experiments to disentangle 'wanting', 'liking', and learning hypotheses. Results from studies that exploited those opportunities are described here.

CONCLUSION

In short, dopamine's contribution appears to be chiefly to cause 'wanting' for hedonic rewards, more than 'liking' or learning for those rewards.

摘要

引言

关于中脑边缘多巴胺系统对奖赏的确切因果贡献,争论仍在继续。存在三种相互竞争的解释类别:“喜好”、学习和“渴望”。多巴胺主要介导奖赏的享乐影响(“喜好”)吗?或者它反而介导对未来奖赏的学习预测、预测误差教学信号并强化联想联系(学习)?还是多巴胺通过赋予与奖赏相关的刺激以激励显著性来激发对奖赏的追求(“渴望”)?这里对每个假设进行了评估,并表明多巴胺功能的激励显著性或“渴望”假设可能比学习或“喜好”假设与更多证据相符。简而言之,最近的证据表明,多巴胺对于介导享乐“喜好”对感官愉悦的变化既非必要也不充分。其他最近的证据表明,新的学习不需要多巴胺,并且多巴胺不足以通过产生教学或预测信号来直接介导学习。相比之下,越来越多的证据表明,多巴胺确实对激励显著性有因果贡献。多巴胺似乎是正常“渴望”所必需的,并且多巴胺激活足以增强线索触发的激励显著性。促进多巴胺信号的滥用药物会短路并使动态中脑边缘机制敏感化,这些机制进化出来是为了赋予奖赏以激励显著性。此类药物与巴甫洛夫联想信息与生理状态信号的激励显著性整合相互作用。这种相互作用为成瘾中导致强迫性“渴望”奠定了基础,但也为实验提供了机会来区分“渴望”、“喜好”和学习假设。这里描述了利用这些机会的研究结果。

结论

简而言之,多巴胺的贡献似乎主要是导致对享乐奖赏的“渴望”,而不是对这些奖赏的“喜好”或学习。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验