Suppr超能文献

[A comparative study of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis with cephalosporins in operative gynecology].

作者信息

Doganov N, Shtereva K, Dimitrov R

出版信息

Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1998;37(2):29-33.

PMID:9859533
Abstract

The article presents the results of a comparative study on the efficacy of perioperative prophylaxis with cefalosporins in abdominal gynaecological operations. A total of 155 women meeting certain inclusion criteria were operated on and were randomly assigned to one of the following regimens: Cefoxitin 3 x 1 g--14 subjects, Cefotetan 2 x 1 g--43 subjects, Cefalotin 3 x 2 g for 24 hours--27 subjects, Cefalotin 3 x 2 g for 72 hours--41 subjects and a control group of 30 subjects without prophylaxis. The course of the postoperative period, the hospital stay and the average costs in each group were assessed and compared. None of patients receiving any prophylaxis developed infectious complications, while such complications occurred in 10% of the control without prophylaxis. The authors conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis effectively prevent the infectious complications and shortens the postoperative hospital stay. Despite its narrower anti-bacterial spectrum Cefalotin is not inferior in its efficacy to the second and the third-generation cefalosporins. While providing equal effect, the 24-hours Cefalotin regimen is from 2.8 to 4.9 times cheaper then the other prophylaxis regimens and is twice cheaper than the no-prophylaxis regimen. The longer 72-hours Cefalotin scheme shows no advantages to the 24-hours one but almost triples the expenses. Additional antibacterial treatment in the postoperative period needs more precise indications since unequivocal reasons for its administration are missing in a number of cases.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验