Robbins T W
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Behav Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;9(7):509-19. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199811000-00005.
The distinction in biology between homology and analogy is examined for possible application to studies in behavioural pharmacology. It is argued that the concept of homology is central to understanding the 'construct validity' of animal models of human cognition. It is suggested that we capitalize on known correspondences across species in brain structure and development which may mediate homologous behavioural functions. Manipulation of specific receptors in defined areas may be achieved by local and systemic administration of drugs with relatively specific actions; this will complement an alternative criterion of construct validity, based on clinical treatments. This argument will be illustrated by a critique of successful extrapolations across species that are sometimes initiated by work in animals and sometimes by work in humans, especially in the clinical setting. The examples used will include analyses of spatial working memory, spatial attention and attentional set-shifting, studied in rats, monkeys and humans.
本文探讨了生物学中同源性与类比性的区别,以寻求其在行为药理学研究中的可能应用。有人认为,同源性概念对于理解人类认知动物模型的“结构效度”至关重要。建议我们利用已知的跨物种大脑结构和发育对应关系,这些关系可能介导同源性行为功能。通过局部和全身给予具有相对特异性作用的药物,可以实现对特定脑区特定受体的操纵;这将补充基于临床治疗的结构效度的另一个标准。这一论点将通过对跨物种成功推断的批判来加以说明,这些推断有时源于动物研究,有时源于人类研究,尤其是在临床环境中。所举例子将包括对大鼠、猴子和人类的空间工作记忆、空间注意力和注意力转移的分析。