Suppr超能文献

拉莫三嗪与治疗药物监测:引入常规服务后的回顾性调查

Lamotrigine and therapeutic drug monitoring: retrospective survey following the introduction of a routine service.

作者信息

Morris R G, Black A B, Harris A L, Batty A B, Sallustio B C

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Dec;46(6):547-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00835.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To review (retrospectively) the relationships between lamotrigine (LTG) dosage and plasma concentrations based on data generated in a routine therapeutic drug monitoring laboratory from a heterogeneous sample of patients with epilepsy. To distinguish patients taking concomitant anti-epileptic therapy which induced or inhibited drug metabolising enzymes, or a combination of both, together with LTG. To survey medical staff who use a routine LTG assay service with a view to establishing the utility of higher plasma LTG concentrations than those used in early clinical trials.

METHODS

All patient assays for LTG received over a 12 month period (339 requests from 149 patients) were reviewed and relationships between dosage and concentration calculated and grouped according to concomitant antiepileptic drug therapy. The doctors requesting the tests were surveyed by questionnaire (n=40 of 67 responded). They were asked for details about the patient's seizure control, rationale used for LTG dosage adjustment and their acceptance of the proposed 'therapeutic range' adopted by the laboratory of 3-14 mg(-1).

RESULTS

Linear relationships were demonstrated between LTG dosage and concentration for the 3 treatment groups (LTG plus valproic acid (VPA), LTG plus enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs, and LTG plus VPA and inducers), however, there were significant differences between groups (P<0.001) with a 4.4 fold difference in dosage: concentration ratios between the LTG plus VPA group and the LTG plus inducers group. The questionnaire showed that the therapeutic range was well accepted by 88% of responders, none of whom considered this higher range to be wrong.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic inhibition by VPA was shown to have a marked effect on LTG kinetics, suggesting either a significant LTG dosage reduction is required if plasma LTG concentrations are elevated, or alternatively, higher plasma LTG concentrations could be attained from lower dosages. The higher therapeutic range adopted by the laboratory (3-14 mg(-1)) was widely accepted and increasingly applied in clinical practice in the management of patients with epilepsy.

摘要

目的

基于常规治疗药物监测实验室从癫痫患者异质性样本中生成的数据,回顾(回顾性)拉莫三嗪(LTG)剂量与血浆浓度之间的关系。区分同时服用诱导或抑制药物代谢酶的抗癫痫治疗药物,或两者兼用的患者与LTG的情况。调查使用常规LTG检测服务的医务人员,以确定高于早期临床试验所用血浆LTG浓度的实用性。

方法

回顾了12个月期间收到的所有LTG患者检测结果(来自149名患者的339份检测申请),计算剂量与浓度之间的关系,并根据同时使用的抗癫痫药物治疗进行分组。通过问卷调查对申请检测的医生进行了调查(67名中有40名回复)。询问了他们关于患者癫痫控制的细节、LTG剂量调整的理由以及他们对实验室采用的拟议“治疗范围”(3 - 14mg/L)的接受程度。

结果

3个治疗组(LTG加丙戊酸(VPA)、LTG加酶诱导抗癫痫药物以及LTG加VPA和诱导剂)的LTG剂量与浓度之间呈现线性关系,然而,各组之间存在显著差异(P<0.001),LTG加VPA组与LTG加诱导剂组的剂量:浓度比相差4.4倍。问卷调查显示,88%的回复者对治疗范围表示认可,没有人认为这个较高范围有误。

结论

VPA的代谢抑制作用对LTG动力学有显著影响,这表明如果血浆LTG浓度升高,要么需要大幅降低LTG剂量,要么可以从较低剂量获得更高的血浆LTG浓度。实验室采用的较高治疗范围(3 - 14mg/L)被广泛接受,并越来越多地应用于癫痫患者管理的临床实践中。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Pharmacokinetic interactions of the new antiepileptic drugs.新型抗癫痫药物的药代动力学相互作用。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Oct;31(4):309-24. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199631040-00006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验