Gordan V V, Vargas M A, Cobb D S, Denehy G E
University of Florida, College of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, Health Science Center, Gainesville 32610-0415, USA.
Oper Dent. 1998 Sep-Oct;23(5):244-9.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal seal of two adhesive systems on class 5 composite resin restorations. Two adhesive systems that use acidic primers were used in this study: Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Denthesive II. Scotchbond Multi-Purpose was used as a control. Class 5 cavity preparations were made at the CEJ (half of the preparation was in enamel and half in dentin/cementum) of 60 extracted human molars. Both systems were used with and without etching. The control group was used with etching only. Composite resin restorations were placed, light cured for 40 seconds, and polished. All specimens were thermocycled 500 times. The specimens were immersed in erythrosin B, tetra-iodo-fluorescent 2% solution, then sectioned to obtain 600 mm-thick sections. These were examined under X13.2 magnification, and the degree of dye penetration was measured in microns. A chi-square test demonstrated no significant differences in microleakage among groups for either dentin (P = 0.54) or enamel (P = 0.35).
本体外研究的目的是评估两种粘结系统在Ⅴ类复合树脂修复体上的边缘封闭性。本研究使用了两种使用酸性底漆的粘结系统:Clearfil Liner Bond 2和Denthesive II。Scotchbond多功能粘结剂用作对照。在60颗拔除的人类磨牙的牙釉质牙骨质界(制备的一半在牙釉质中,一半在牙本质/牙骨质中)制备Ⅴ类窝洞。两种系统均在酸蚀和未酸蚀的情况下使用。对照组仅在酸蚀情况下使用。放置复合树脂修复体,光固化40秒并抛光。所有标本进行500次热循环。将标本浸入2%的四碘荧光素B溶液中,然后切片以获得600μm厚的切片。在13.2倍放大倍数下检查这些切片,并以微米为单位测量染料渗透程度。卡方检验表明,在牙本质(P = 0.54)或牙釉质(P = 0.35)中,各组之间的微渗漏无显著差异。