Heyland D K, MacDonald S, Keefe L, Drover J W
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 1998 Dec 16;280(23):2013-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.23.2013.
Nutritional support has become a standard of care for hospitalized patients, but whether total parenteral nutrition (TPN) affects morbidity and mortality is unclear.
To examine the relationship between TPN and complication and mortality rates in critically ill patients.
Computerized search of published research on MEDLINE from 1980 to 1998, personal files, and review of relevant reference lists.
We reviewed 210 titles, abstracts, and papers. Primary studies were included if they were randomized clinical trials of critically ill or surgical patients that evaluated the effect of TPN (compared with standard care) on complication and mortality rates. We excluded studies comparing TPN with enteral nutrition.
Relevant data were abstracted on the methodology and outcomes of primary studies. Data were abstracted in duplicate, independently.
There were 26 randomized trials of 2211 patients comparing the use of TPN with standard care (usual oral diet plus intravenous dextrose) in surgical and critically ill patients. When the results of these trials were aggregated, TPN had no effect on mortality (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.31). Patients who received TPN tended to have a lower complication rate, but this result was not statistically significant (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.09). We examined several a priori hypotheses and found that studies including only malnourished patients were associated with lower complication rates but no difference in mortality when compared with studies of nonmalnourished patients. Studies published since 1989 and studies with a higher methods score showed no treatment effect, while studies published in 1988 or before and studies with a lower methods score demonstrated a significant treatment effect. Complication rates were lower in studies that did not use lipids; however, there was no difference in mortality rates between studies that did not use lipids and those studies that did. Studies limited to critically ill patients demonstrated a significant increase in complication and mortality rates compared with studies of surgical patients.
Total parenteral nutrition does not influence the overall mortality rate of surgical or critically ill patients. It may reduce the complication rate, especially in malnourished patients, but study results are influenced by patient population, use of lipids, methodological quality, and year of publication.
营养支持已成为住院患者的一种治疗标准,但全胃肠外营养(TPN)是否会影响发病率和死亡率尚不清楚。
研究TPN与重症患者并发症及死亡率之间的关系。
对1980年至1998年发表在MEDLINE上的研究进行计算机检索、个人档案以及相关参考文献列表回顾。
我们查阅了210篇标题、摘要和论文。如果是对重症或外科患者进行的随机临床试验,评估TPN(与标准治疗相比)对并发症和死亡率的影响,则纳入主要研究。我们排除了比较TPN与肠内营养的研究。
提取主要研究的方法和结果的相关数据。数据由两人独立重复提取。
有26项针对2211例患者的随机试验,比较了外科和重症患者中TPN与标准治疗(常规口服饮食加静脉输注葡萄糖)的使用情况。当汇总这些试验的结果时,TPN对死亡率无影响(风险比[RR],1.03;95%置信区间[CI],0.81 - 1.31)。接受TPN的患者并发症发生率往往较低,但这一结果无统计学意义(RR,0.84;95% CI,0.64 - 1.09)。我们检验了几个预先设定的假设,发现与非营养不良患者的研究相比,仅纳入营养不良患者的研究并发症发生率较低,但死亡率无差异。1989年以后发表的研究以及方法学评分较高的研究未显示出治疗效果,而1988年或之前发表的研究以及方法学评分较低的研究显示出显著的治疗效果。未使用脂质的研究并发症发生率较低;然而,未使用脂质的研究与使用脂质的研究之间死亡率无差异。与外科患者的研究相比,仅限于重症患者的研究并发症和死亡率显著增加。
全胃肠外营养不影响外科或重症患者的总体死亡率。它可能会降低并发症发生率,尤其是在营养不良患者中,但研究结果受患者群体、脂质使用、方法学质量和发表年份的影响。