Suppr超能文献

The extent of non-adherence in a large AIDS clinical trial using plasma dideoxynucleoside concentrations as a marker.

作者信息

Kastrissios H, Suárez J R, Hammer S, Katzenstein D, Blaschke T F

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5130, USA.

出版信息

AIDS. 1998 Dec 3;12(17):2305-11. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199817000-00012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess adherence to study medications in an AIDS clinical trial, to evaluate whether study participants adhered to only one component of a multidrug regimen ('differential adherence'), and to determine whether there was evidence of non-uniform adherence to study medications among treatment groups.

SETTING

This was a substudy of AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 175, a large, double-blind, randomized study of monotherapy versus combination dideoxynucleoside therapy. Participants were required to adhere to a complex regimen of zidovudine, zalcitabine and didanosine, or their matching placebos.

DESIGN

Between October 1992 and January 1994, study sites were selected at random, and a 1-week period was designated during which study participants attending routine clinic visits provided a blood sample and dosing history. Participants were not informed of the purpose of the substudy.

MEASUREMENTS

Adherence was assessed using plasma drug concentrations and defined by the presence of detectable drug in a plasma sample obtained within a specified analysis window.

RESULTS

Of 722 plasma samples analyzed, approximately 75% contained detectable concentrations of the assigned drugs and 5-14.5% contained no detectable drugs. Approximately 7 and 13% of samples from participants assigned to monotherapy arms contained non-prescribed dideoxynucleosides, and 14 and 19% assigned to combination therapies contained only one drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Various non-adherence behaviors were observed, including patterns of underdosing and taking non-prescribed drugs. Non-adherence was moderate but uniform amongst the treatment groups and may have contributed to a marginal reduction in the power of the primary intent-to-treat analysis to detect differences in efficacy amongst the assigned treatments.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验