Waschbusch D A, Willoughby M T, Pelham W E
ADHD Research Program, Western psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Clin Child Psychol. 1998 Dec;27(4):396-405. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2704_3.
Examined the criterion validity and the utility of Dodge and Coie's (1987) measure of reactive and proactive aggression. Participants were 405 children in kindergarten through 5th grade attending an urban elementary school. Examined criterion validity by testing whether reactive aggression or proactive aggression was significantly correlated with criterion measures of overall impairment as measured by the Impairment Rating Scale (Pelham, Gnagy, et al., 1996), classroom behavior as measured by a frequency count of classroom rule violations, and peer adjustment as measured by teacher ratings of peer behavior on the Pittsburgh Modified IOWA Conners (Pelham, Milich, Murphy, & Murphy, 1989). Examined utility by testing whether reactive aggression or proactive aggression was significantly correlated with criterion measures after controlling for each other and after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder as measured by the Disruptive Behavior Disorder Rating Scales (Pelham, Gnagy, Greenslade, & Milich, 1992). Results showed good evidence of criterion validity for both reactive and proactive aggression, but mixed evidence for their utility.
检验了道奇和科伊(1987年)的反应性攻击和主动性攻击测量方法的效标效度及实用性。研究参与者为405名就读于一所城市小学的幼儿园至五年级儿童。通过测试反应性攻击或主动性攻击是否与由损伤评定量表(佩勒姆、格纳吉等人,1996年)测量的总体损伤、由课堂规则违反次数统计测量的课堂行为以及由匹兹堡修订的爱荷华康纳斯量表(佩勒姆、米利奇、墨菲和墨菲,1989年)测量的同伴行为教师评定所衡量的同伴适应等效标测量显著相关,来检验效标效度。通过测试在相互控制以及控制了由破坏性行为障碍评定量表(佩勒姆、格纳吉、格林斯莱德和米利奇,1992年)测量的注意力缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍和品行障碍之后,反应性攻击或主动性攻击是否与效标测量显著相关,来检验实用性。结果显示,反应性攻击和主动性攻击均有充分的效标效度证据,但其实用性证据不一。